All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:02:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABdtJHuEpg0+whCvQn2oHOVX9wqjS3LUDyaHJr6vf31Kuj+-Fg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9348e07e23db4522b79318b81937f221@huawei.com>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:51 PM Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.murphy@arm.com]
> > Sent: 14 June 2021 11:06
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > Cc: jon@solid-run.com; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>;
> > yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> > wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and
> > install bypass SMR
> >
> > On 2021-05-24 12:02, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > From: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
> > >
> > > Check if there is any RMR info associated with the devices behind
> > > the SMMU and if any, install bypass SMRs for them. This is to
> > > keep any ongoing traffic associated with these devices alive
> > > when we enable/reset SMMU during probe().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 65
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > index 6f72c4d208ca..56db3d3238fc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > @@ -2042,6 +2042,67 @@ err_reset_platform_ops: __maybe_unused;
> > >     return err;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +static void arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_smr(struct arm_smmu_device
> > *smmu)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct list_head rmr_list;
> > > +   struct iommu_resv_region *e;
> > > +   int i, cnt = 0;
> > > +   u32 smr;
> > > +   u32 reg;
> > > +
> > > +   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rmr_list);
> > > +   if (iommu_dma_get_rmrs(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list))
> > > +           return;
> > > +
> > > +   reg = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> > > +
> > > +   if ((reg & ARM_SMMU_sCR0_USFCFG) && !(reg &
> > ARM_SMMU_sCR0_CLIENTPD)) {
> > > +           /*
> > > +            * SMMU is already enabled and disallowing bypass, so preserve
> > > +            * the existing SMRs
> > > +            */
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> > > +                   smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
> >
> > To reiterate, just because a bootloader/crashed kernel/whatever may have
> > left some configuration behind doesn't mean that it matters (e.g. what
> > if these SMRs are pointing at translation contexts?). All we should be
> > doing here is setting the relevant RMR accommodations in our "clean
> > slate" software state before the reset routine applies it to the
> > hardware, just like patch #5 does for SMMUv3.
> >
> > Trying to safely reset an SMMU when we discover it with CLIENTPD=0 is
> > really another issue entirely, and I'd say is beyond the scope of this
> > series
> >
> > > +                   if (!FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr))
> > > +                           continue;
> >
> > Note that that's not even necessarily correct (thanks to EXIDS).
> >
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK,
> > smr);
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> > > +           }
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   list_for_each_entry(e, &rmr_list, list) {
> > > +           u32 sid = e->fw_data.rmr.sid;
> > > +
> > > +           i = arm_smmu_find_sme(smmu, sid, ~0);
> > > +           if (i < 0)
> > > +                   continue;
> > > +           if (smmu->s2crs[i].count == 0) {
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].id = sid;
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].mask = ~0;
> >
> > This is very wrong (as has now already been pointed out).
> >
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> > > +           }
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].count++;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].type = S2CR_TYPE_BYPASS;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].privcfg = S2CR_PRIVCFG_DEFAULT;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].cbndx = 0xff;
> >
> > Nit: cbndx is left uninitialised for bypass/fault entries elsewhere, so
> > there's little point touching it here.
> >
> > > +
> > > +           cnt++;
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   if ((reg & ARM_SMMU_sCR0_USFCFG) && !(reg &
> > ARM_SMMU_sCR0_CLIENTPD)) {
> > > +           /* Remove the valid bit for unused SMRs */
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> > > +                   if (smmu->s2crs[i].count == 0)
> > > +                           smmu->smrs[i].valid = false;
> > > +           }
> >
> > If this dance is only about avoiding stream match conflicts when trying
> > to reprogram live SMRs, simply turning the SMMU off beforehand would be
> > a lot simpler.
>
> Hi Steve/Jon,
>
> Since I don’t have access to an SMMUv2 setup, really appreciate if one of you
> could please take a look at the above comments and provide me with a tested
> code so that I can include it in the v6 that I am planning to send out soon.

Will do.  Thanks.
Jon

>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> > Robin.
> >
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   dev_notice(smmu->dev, "\tpreserved %d boot mapping%s\n", cnt,
> > > +              cnt == 1 ? "" : "s");
> > > +   iommu_dma_put_rmrs(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   {
> > >     struct resource *res;
> > > @@ -2168,6 +2229,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smmu);
> > > +
> > > +   /* Check for RMRs and install bypass SMRs if any */
> > > +   arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_smr(smmu);
> > > +
> > >     arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
> > >     arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
> > >
> > >

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
	"Guohanjun \(Hanjun Guo\)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:02:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABdtJHuEpg0+whCvQn2oHOVX9wqjS3LUDyaHJr6vf31Kuj+-Fg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9348e07e23db4522b79318b81937f221@huawei.com>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:51 PM Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.murphy@arm.com]
> > Sent: 14 June 2021 11:06
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > Cc: jon@solid-run.com; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>;
> > yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> > wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and
> > install bypass SMR
> >
> > On 2021-05-24 12:02, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > From: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
> > >
> > > Check if there is any RMR info associated with the devices behind
> > > the SMMU and if any, install bypass SMRs for them. This is to
> > > keep any ongoing traffic associated with these devices alive
> > > when we enable/reset SMMU during probe().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 65
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > index 6f72c4d208ca..56db3d3238fc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > @@ -2042,6 +2042,67 @@ err_reset_platform_ops: __maybe_unused;
> > >     return err;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +static void arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_smr(struct arm_smmu_device
> > *smmu)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct list_head rmr_list;
> > > +   struct iommu_resv_region *e;
> > > +   int i, cnt = 0;
> > > +   u32 smr;
> > > +   u32 reg;
> > > +
> > > +   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rmr_list);
> > > +   if (iommu_dma_get_rmrs(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list))
> > > +           return;
> > > +
> > > +   reg = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> > > +
> > > +   if ((reg & ARM_SMMU_sCR0_USFCFG) && !(reg &
> > ARM_SMMU_sCR0_CLIENTPD)) {
> > > +           /*
> > > +            * SMMU is already enabled and disallowing bypass, so preserve
> > > +            * the existing SMRs
> > > +            */
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> > > +                   smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
> >
> > To reiterate, just because a bootloader/crashed kernel/whatever may have
> > left some configuration behind doesn't mean that it matters (e.g. what
> > if these SMRs are pointing at translation contexts?). All we should be
> > doing here is setting the relevant RMR accommodations in our "clean
> > slate" software state before the reset routine applies it to the
> > hardware, just like patch #5 does for SMMUv3.
> >
> > Trying to safely reset an SMMU when we discover it with CLIENTPD=0 is
> > really another issue entirely, and I'd say is beyond the scope of this
> > series
> >
> > > +                   if (!FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr))
> > > +                           continue;
> >
> > Note that that's not even necessarily correct (thanks to EXIDS).
> >
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK,
> > smr);
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> > > +           }
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   list_for_each_entry(e, &rmr_list, list) {
> > > +           u32 sid = e->fw_data.rmr.sid;
> > > +
> > > +           i = arm_smmu_find_sme(smmu, sid, ~0);
> > > +           if (i < 0)
> > > +                   continue;
> > > +           if (smmu->s2crs[i].count == 0) {
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].id = sid;
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].mask = ~0;
> >
> > This is very wrong (as has now already been pointed out).
> >
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> > > +           }
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].count++;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].type = S2CR_TYPE_BYPASS;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].privcfg = S2CR_PRIVCFG_DEFAULT;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].cbndx = 0xff;
> >
> > Nit: cbndx is left uninitialised for bypass/fault entries elsewhere, so
> > there's little point touching it here.
> >
> > > +
> > > +           cnt++;
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   if ((reg & ARM_SMMU_sCR0_USFCFG) && !(reg &
> > ARM_SMMU_sCR0_CLIENTPD)) {
> > > +           /* Remove the valid bit for unused SMRs */
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> > > +                   if (smmu->s2crs[i].count == 0)
> > > +                           smmu->smrs[i].valid = false;
> > > +           }
> >
> > If this dance is only about avoiding stream match conflicts when trying
> > to reprogram live SMRs, simply turning the SMMU off beforehand would be
> > a lot simpler.
>
> Hi Steve/Jon,
>
> Since I don’t have access to an SMMUv2 setup, really appreciate if one of you
> could please take a look at the above comments and provide me with a tested
> code so that I can include it in the v6 that I am planning to send out soon.

Will do.  Thanks.
Jon

>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> > Robin.
> >
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   dev_notice(smmu->dev, "\tpreserved %d boot mapping%s\n", cnt,
> > > +              cnt == 1 ? "" : "s");
> > > +   iommu_dma_put_rmrs(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   {
> > >     struct resource *res;
> > > @@ -2168,6 +2229,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smmu);
> > > +
> > > +   /* Check for RMRs and install bypass SMRs if any */
> > > +   arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_smr(smmu);
> > > +
> > >     arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
> > >     arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
> > >
> > >
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	 "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	 "steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	 yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	 wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:02:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABdtJHuEpg0+whCvQn2oHOVX9wqjS3LUDyaHJr6vf31Kuj+-Fg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9348e07e23db4522b79318b81937f221@huawei.com>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:51 PM Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.murphy@arm.com]
> > Sent: 14 June 2021 11:06
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > Cc: jon@solid-run.com; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > steven.price@arm.com; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>;
> > yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> > wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and
> > install bypass SMR
> >
> > On 2021-05-24 12:02, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > From: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
> > >
> > > Check if there is any RMR info associated with the devices behind
> > > the SMMU and if any, install bypass SMRs for them. This is to
> > > keep any ongoing traffic associated with these devices alive
> > > when we enable/reset SMMU during probe().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 65
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > index 6f72c4d208ca..56db3d3238fc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > > @@ -2042,6 +2042,67 @@ err_reset_platform_ops: __maybe_unused;
> > >     return err;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +static void arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_smr(struct arm_smmu_device
> > *smmu)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct list_head rmr_list;
> > > +   struct iommu_resv_region *e;
> > > +   int i, cnt = 0;
> > > +   u32 smr;
> > > +   u32 reg;
> > > +
> > > +   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rmr_list);
> > > +   if (iommu_dma_get_rmrs(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list))
> > > +           return;
> > > +
> > > +   reg = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> > > +
> > > +   if ((reg & ARM_SMMU_sCR0_USFCFG) && !(reg &
> > ARM_SMMU_sCR0_CLIENTPD)) {
> > > +           /*
> > > +            * SMMU is already enabled and disallowing bypass, so preserve
> > > +            * the existing SMRs
> > > +            */
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> > > +                   smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
> >
> > To reiterate, just because a bootloader/crashed kernel/whatever may have
> > left some configuration behind doesn't mean that it matters (e.g. what
> > if these SMRs are pointing at translation contexts?). All we should be
> > doing here is setting the relevant RMR accommodations in our "clean
> > slate" software state before the reset routine applies it to the
> > hardware, just like patch #5 does for SMMUv3.
> >
> > Trying to safely reset an SMMU when we discover it with CLIENTPD=0 is
> > really another issue entirely, and I'd say is beyond the scope of this
> > series
> >
> > > +                   if (!FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr))
> > > +                           continue;
> >
> > Note that that's not even necessarily correct (thanks to EXIDS).
> >
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK,
> > smr);
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> > > +           }
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   list_for_each_entry(e, &rmr_list, list) {
> > > +           u32 sid = e->fw_data.rmr.sid;
> > > +
> > > +           i = arm_smmu_find_sme(smmu, sid, ~0);
> > > +           if (i < 0)
> > > +                   continue;
> > > +           if (smmu->s2crs[i].count == 0) {
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].id = sid;
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].mask = ~0;
> >
> > This is very wrong (as has now already been pointed out).
> >
> > > +                   smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
> > > +           }
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].count++;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].type = S2CR_TYPE_BYPASS;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].privcfg = S2CR_PRIVCFG_DEFAULT;
> > > +           smmu->s2crs[i].cbndx = 0xff;
> >
> > Nit: cbndx is left uninitialised for bypass/fault entries elsewhere, so
> > there's little point touching it here.
> >
> > > +
> > > +           cnt++;
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   if ((reg & ARM_SMMU_sCR0_USFCFG) && !(reg &
> > ARM_SMMU_sCR0_CLIENTPD)) {
> > > +           /* Remove the valid bit for unused SMRs */
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
> > > +                   if (smmu->s2crs[i].count == 0)
> > > +                           smmu->smrs[i].valid = false;
> > > +           }
> >
> > If this dance is only about avoiding stream match conflicts when trying
> > to reprogram live SMRs, simply turning the SMMU off beforehand would be
> > a lot simpler.
>
> Hi Steve/Jon,
>
> Since I don’t have access to an SMMUv2 setup, really appreciate if one of you
> could please take a look at the above comments and provide me with a tested
> code so that I can include it in the v6 that I am planning to send out soon.

Will do.  Thanks.
Jon

>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> > Robin.
> >
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   dev_notice(smmu->dev, "\tpreserved %d boot mapping%s\n", cnt,
> > > +              cnt == 1 ? "" : "s");
> > > +   iommu_dma_put_rmrs(dev_fwnode(smmu->dev), &rmr_list);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   {
> > >     struct resource *res;
> > > @@ -2168,6 +2229,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smmu);
> > > +
> > > +   /* Check for RMRs and install bypass SMRs if any */
> > > +   arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_smr(smmu);
> > > +
> > >     arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
> > >     arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
> > >
> > >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-24 11:02 [PATCH v5 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02 ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02 ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-06-14 11:14   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 11:14     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 11:14     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 12:37     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 12:37       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 12:37       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 15:35   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-24 15:35     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-24 15:35     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-24 15:35     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-26  7:53   ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-05-26  7:53     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-05-26  7:53     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-05-26 16:36     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-26 16:36       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-26 16:36       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-26 17:11       ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-05-26 17:11         ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-05-26 17:11         ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-06-03 12:27         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03 12:27           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03 12:27           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03 12:32           ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-06-03 12:32             ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-06-03 12:32             ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-05-27  4:25       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-05-27  4:25         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-05-27  4:25         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-14 10:35       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:35         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:35         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 11:23   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 11:23     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 11:23     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 12:49     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 12:49       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 12:49       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-29 17:34       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29 17:34         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29 17:34         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-07-04  7:38         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-07-04  7:38           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-07-04  7:38           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-07-05  9:10           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-07-05  9:10             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-07-05  9:10             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add bypass flag to arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent() Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-06-14 10:23   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:23     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:23     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 12:51     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 12:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 12:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-06-14 10:15   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:15     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:15     ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-06-03  8:52   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03  8:52     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03  8:52     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03 11:27     ` Steven Price
2021-06-03 11:27       ` Steven Price
2021-06-03 11:27       ` Steven Price
2021-06-03 11:51       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03 11:51         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-03 11:51         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-13  7:40         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-13  7:40           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-13  7:40           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-14  9:23           ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14  9:23             ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14  9:23             ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:06   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:06     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 10:06     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-14 16:51     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 16:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-14 16:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-15  8:02       ` Jon Nettleton [this message]
2021-06-15  8:02         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-15  8:02         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29  7:03     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29  7:03       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29  7:03       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29 13:22       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-29 13:22         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-29 13:22         ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-29 16:25         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29 16:25           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-29 16:25           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-06-30  8:50           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-30  8:50             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-06-30  8:50             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-05-24 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 11:02   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-05-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Steven Price
2021-05-24 15:18   ` Steven Price
2021-05-24 15:18   ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABdtJHuEpg0+whCvQn2oHOVX9wqjS3LUDyaHJr6vf31Kuj+-Fg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.