From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933016Ab2CZQxP (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:53:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:52481 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932982Ab2CZQxM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:53:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F6F73B9.2000207@zytor.com> References: <1331781125-15658-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <4F6F73B9.2000207@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] seccomp_filter: syscall filtering using BPF From: Will Drewry To: "H. Peter Anvin" , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, mcgrathr@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, luto@mit.edu, eparis@redhat.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, djm@mindrot.org, scarybeasts@gmail.com, indan@nul.nu, pmoore@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, markus@chromium.org, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 03/14/2012 08:11 PM, Will Drewry wrote: >> Please see prior revisions of this patch series for a high >> level blurb. >> >> This revision makes a number of refinements and tweaks. The biggest >> change is a slight renumbering of the return codes which will break >> existing code using this patch series. >> >> I believe this patch is in good shape, and I don't see the need for >> any more API changes at this point.  I plan to start using this revision >> more extensively, and I'd certainly appreciate any testing. >> >> Thanks! >> will >> > > x86 portions: > > Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin Thanks! > What is the preferred way to push this upstream?  (Presumably for 3.5 at > this point, but we should get it into -next as soon as possible after > the merge window.) A repost when rc1 has been cut is what's been suggested to me. Additionally, two tweaks have been pointed out off list (documentation cruft and lack if #ifdef for asm/syscall.h), which I have fixed in my local and github tree but haven't yet reposted here. I was planning on just posting v17 when rc1 is cut (unless I've blithely missed it already) and then trying to pester everyone and anyone who can merge. :) Maybe someone more authoritative than me will answer though. thanks! will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F6F73B9.2000207@zytor.com> References: <1331781125-15658-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <4F6F73B9.2000207@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:06 -0500 Message-ID: From: Will Drewry Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] seccomp_filter: syscall filtering using BPF To: "H. Peter Anvin" , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, mcgrathr@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, luto@mit.edu, eparis@redhat.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, djm@mindrot.org, scarybeasts@gmail.com, indan@nul.nu, pmoore@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, markus@chromium.org, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 03/14/2012 08:11 PM, Will Drewry wrote: >> Please see prior revisions of this patch series for a high >> level blurb. >> >> This revision makes a number of refinements and tweaks. The biggest >> change is a slight renumbering of the return codes which will break >> existing code using this patch series. >> >> I believe this patch is in good shape, and I don't see the need for >> any more API changes at this point. =A0I plan to start using this revisi= on >> more extensively, and I'd certainly appreciate any testing. >> >> Thanks! >> will >> > > x86 portions: > > Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin Thanks! > What is the preferred way to push this upstream? =A0(Presumably for 3.5 a= t > this point, but we should get it into -next as soon as possible after > the merge window.) A repost when rc1 has been cut is what's been suggested to me. Additionally, two tweaks have been pointed out off list (documentation cruft and lack if #ifdef for asm/syscall.h), which I have fixed in my local and github tree but haven't yet reposted here. I was planning on just posting v17 when rc1 is cut (unless I've blithely missed it already) and then trying to pester everyone and anyone who can merge. :) Maybe someone more authoritative than me will answer though. thanks! will