From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0034C43603 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465D2073B for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=skyboxlabs-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@skyboxlabs-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="oBhtON/U" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730609AbfLLTBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 14:01:08 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com ([209.85.167.67]:36554 "EHLO mail-lf1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730261AbfLLTBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 14:01:08 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n12so74740lfe.3 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:01:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skyboxlabs-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jz9rKhZCM7p+Bzm/tdHY4FSQSKhfLXm6wg/r86n+yt8=; b=oBhtON/Uzg7gRMYqIIPy4LMlvpi7CMkvWKkQXUjU8141AZZ3E2SHMNSmze+9VNbCXk ckwiPTOchgSJrGaTCCEcaf/tHWi02ZMxC7Bfk5wKaiSego/+xnLOL9yLzIKsFrMOLQHj 16UluWmC1kpWSss56+ET/pyg9na+aNg9rRkQWVV178mMESvhjQiKh2xxpu7gG2gArN40 6MxIe5l3EViVafPiiDbExxJYvSgyVUSfhiHNkrWJN0za8hUnvxfQfvVGt0KdLZqwX4Ix x4RKVYnc7QVclatkdJmh7/jTJDbAdgwj3vmDIJ7LlW9oJM2Ch5VuSmOwHUzvU3LTeai0 VPbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jz9rKhZCM7p+Bzm/tdHY4FSQSKhfLXm6wg/r86n+yt8=; b=gzhR2xLpb1eXmmyTxo1K66yS1Vqpkg1ICo4BdMwZPgqbY1HaEFzlWTAPP4HbuvL5da W+HttgRI70lIigOhxSapAhT+WL66yobBK+0LK8xSPhtbgiRc8eQaU6sfUcQoCC6pNE8p 2DboTYy03jTLT0QCwLAQ8yLLQgskoS945zame/nymNuAD/JWlIExVouAzbjGefiiopL5 RijAg5lh1cagJZ7Ur8Q+VSVxttlUWnTDnylTCV+AqUZJchrgJPjjWrLluCmInXCbveut FAAQhTEDgBa8XkjrP5/zwbNlr8Xc2zYWjNqOMNjXSggoRoZGhJNkTqVRz+Hg0jWNgXvm vngw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWeWYGq9mxtnB3Col/tLpOlp+A8eV59pEvYJ95G102bb92tGpoU 7hiwX/a4EyK3CaVDhTvR3br2X/mtnvMogmmBvevZ8ntBL00= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylHxYB900eIvbU9Bmp3/V4JFv5YMY/F9ekTciQqfB3/mlC2GoFQKVT0wyDFGzagdVYhtSpQ16Xb6tvDvHmaBU= X-Received: by 2002:a19:f006:: with SMTP id p6mr6588012lfc.94.1576177266240; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:01:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191207003333.3228-1-yang.zhao@skyboxlabs.com> <20191207003333.3228-2-yang.zhao@skyboxlabs.com> <20191210103014.GF6527@szeder.dev> <20191212141322.GK6527@szeder.dev> <20191212171516.GL6527@szeder.dev> In-Reply-To: <20191212171516.GL6527@szeder.dev> From: Yang Zhao Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:02:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] ci: also run linux-gcc pipeline with python-3.7 environment To: =?UTF-8?Q?SZEDER_G=C3=A1bor?= Cc: Git Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:15 AM SZEDER G=C3=A1bor wr= ote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 09:04:24AM -0800, Yang Zhao wrote: > > Unless there's a very good reason to _not_ use Azure Pipeline's > > built-in Python version selection support, I believe it's more > > desirable in the long-run to leverage the feature rather than maintain > > some custom solution. > > Azure Pipelines's built-in Python version selection support only works > on Azure Pipelines, therefore it's more desirable to have a general > solution. That's fair. However, if we actually want to have something unified that works for Linux and macOS (t90** isn't run on Windows afaict) then I won't have the bandwidth for it in the near term. I'd be more inclined to drop the CI changes from the series if we don't want a stop-gap in the meantime.