From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967854AbdIZIAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 04:00:20 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:37555 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967837AbdIZIAR (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 04:00:17 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBPB8dFM0+0Byo/FOrxR3tHdnZYxiEPkHzCYor5USEeTvh/dwuck0NgWyBK7gcKOCE3JK0KqwxIiqqvS+wbcsE= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [149.6.131.75] In-Reply-To: References: <20170615185418.13980-1-javier@dowhile0.org> <20170615185418.13980-11-javier@dowhile0.org> <67a9d32a-0a20-f101-4660-0d5aa5ad8a8a@xilinx.com> From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 10/16] ARM: dts: zynq: Add generic compatible string for I2C EEPROM To: Michal Simek Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel , Wolfram Sang , Rob Herring , =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.9.2017 11:41, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Michal, >> >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> Ok. Applied to >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynq/dt >>> >>> Will wait if something else pop up. >>> >> >> I see the patch applied to that repository but I don't see it in >> neither mainline nor linux-next. > > xilinx tree was merging to linux-next but there were conflicts with arm > soc tree that's why it was removed. > >> >>> Arnd: If you want to take this directly, feel free to do it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michal > > It is in queue for v4.15. > Got it, thanks a lot for the info. > FYI: There are still 3 more in doc. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt:50: > compatible = " "; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/nxp,pca9541.txt:25: > compatible = "at,24c08"; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.txt:34:at,24c08 > i2c serial eeprom (24cxx) > Indeed, thanks for pointing out. I'll take a look to these as well. > > Thanks, > Michal > Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 10/16] ARM: dts: zynq: Add generic compatible string for I2C EEPROM Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170615185418.13980-1-javier@dowhile0.org> <20170615185418.13980-11-javier@dowhile0.org> <67a9d32a-0a20-f101-4660-0d5aa5ad8a8a@xilinx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michal Simek Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel , Wolfram Sang , Rob Herring , =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.9.2017 11:41, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Michal, >> >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> Ok. Applied to >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynq/dt >>> >>> Will wait if something else pop up. >>> >> >> I see the patch applied to that repository but I don't see it in >> neither mainline nor linux-next. > > xilinx tree was merging to linux-next but there were conflicts with arm > soc tree that's why it was removed. > >> >>> Arnd: If you want to take this directly, feel free to do it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michal > > It is in queue for v4.15. > Got it, thanks a lot for the info. > FYI: There are still 3 more in doc. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt:50: > compatible = " "; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/nxp,pca9541.txt:25: > compatible = "at,24c08"; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.txt:34:at,24c08 > i2c serial eeprom (24cxx) > Indeed, thanks for pointing out. I'll take a look to these as well. > > Thanks, > Michal > Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:00:16 +0200 Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 10/16] ARM: dts: zynq: Add generic compatible string for I2C EEPROM In-Reply-To: References: <20170615185418.13980-1-javier@dowhile0.org> <20170615185418.13980-11-javier@dowhile0.org> <67a9d32a-0a20-f101-4660-0d5aa5ad8a8a@xilinx.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.9.2017 11:41, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Michal, >> >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> Ok. Applied to >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynq/dt >>> >>> Will wait if something else pop up. >>> >> >> I see the patch applied to that repository but I don't see it in >> neither mainline nor linux-next. > > xilinx tree was merging to linux-next but there were conflicts with arm > soc tree that's why it was removed. > >> >>> Arnd: If you want to take this directly, feel free to do it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michal > > It is in queue for v4.15. > Got it, thanks a lot for the info. > FYI: There are still 3 more in doc. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt:50: > compatible = " "; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/nxp,pca9541.txt:25: > compatible = "at,24c08"; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.txt:34:at,24c08 > i2c serial eeprom (24cxx) > Indeed, thanks for pointing out. I'll take a look to these as well. > > Thanks, > Michal > Best regards, Javier