From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S966829AbdEWIqZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 23 May 2017 04:46:25 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:33739 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1758135AbdEWIqS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 23 May 2017 04:46:18 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [90.68.25.6]
In-Reply-To: <CABxcv=nXhyuRwwhzv0H8mK98wUmAPDNPErkV92o9nRFZV2dEsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170504052107.18995-1-javier@dowhile0.org> <20170504080931.GA1487@katana>
 <20170504115016.ayrgbqdshdvnop6k@dell> <CABxcv=nXhyuRwwhzv0H8mK98wUmAPDNPErkV92o9nRFZV2dEsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:46:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CABxcv=n+BfADaoc0dG7hBBPZS2F6TtxgjhwBv8f=GVYSdjovGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are
 missing it
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello Lee,

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> thanks for the series.
>>>
>>> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
>>> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
>>> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
>>>
>>> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all
>
> Yes, I didn't mention 5 because is just a documentation change. But it
> would be better if is merged together with 2-4 indeed.
>
>>> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD.
>>> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently.
>>
>> I can pick them up, no problem.  Can the ARM patches be taking
>> independently?  I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one
>> another.
>>
>
> That's corect. The only platform changes that can't be picked
> independently from MFD are the ones in patch 2, but tha's why I added
> in the same patch. The OMAP folks (Tony and Aaro) already acked so you
> can pick it.
>

Is there anything else I need to do for you to pick this series?

Best regards,
Javier