From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:05:07 +0800
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fit: skip signature verification if board
	request
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ0VkCQJPjM5fyze-TsBV8vN1zJjGtW2Ua-=nr2K+Qq2gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1523459585-7594-1-git-send-email-jun.nie@linaro.org>
 <CAPnjgZ0VkCQJPjM5fyze-TsBV8vN1zJjGtW2Ua-=nr2K+Qq2gw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABymUCMErQT+J0ET1NUrCypo7cLybNtTwskGoOyAcDR9YMoFtA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

2018-04-13 1:24 GMT+08:00 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>:
> Hi,
>
> On 11 April 2018 at 09:13, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> wrote:
>> It may be unnecessary to check signature on unlocked board.
>> Get the hint from platform specific code to support secure boot
>> and non-secure boot with the same binary, so that boot is not
>> blocked if board is not locked and has no key for signature
>> verification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
>> ---
>
> Instead of a weak function can you please add a parameter to this
> function (perhaps a flags word?) and a add test for this case to the
> test?
>
> Regards,
> Simon

Sure, I can add a parameter to the function. But not sure what's the
usage of it in your mind. Maybe "int flag" is enough for you?

Do you mean add implementation of this function for a specific platform
for "add test"?

Best Regards,
Jun