From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alfredo Deza Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph-disk removal roadmap (was ceph-disk is now deprecated) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:28:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171201081757.qwfo2lrhpmg77jgd@nora.maurer-it.com> <20171201082810.GH30636@shell.dmz.bit.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:41345 "EHLO mail-qt0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750988AbdLAR2H (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:28:07 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f182.google.com with SMTP id i40so13952269qti.8 for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:28:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171201082810.GH30636@shell.dmz.bit.nl> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stefan Kooman Cc: ceph-users , ceph-devel On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > Quoting Fabian Grünbichler (f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com): >> I think the above roadmap is a good compromise for all involved parties, >> and I hope we can use the remainder of Luminous to prepare for a >> seam- and painless transition to ceph-volume in time for the Mimic >> release, and then finally retire ceph-disk for good! > > Will the upcoming 12.2.2 release ship with a ceph-volume capable of > doing bluestore on top of LVM? Yes, see the open pr for it (https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy/pull/455) > Eager to use ceph-volume for that, and > skip entirely over ceph-disk and our manual osd prepare process ... Now please note that the API will change in a non backwards compatible way, so a major release of ceph-deploy will be done after that is merged. > > Gr. Stefan > > -- > | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/ Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 > | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / info@bit.nl