Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] intel-iommu: don't warn guest errors when getting rid2pasid entry

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] intel-iommu: don't warn guest errors when getting rid2pasid entry
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:24:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtF1BpZoiC1ycoUiF7Y3m9ATkGjGrfU_6OimKLfyKh_+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YmHzG4/pAqD9MLE1@xz-m1.local>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 8:13 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 04:36:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > If not, do we want to apply this version scheme only when it
> > > reaches the production quality or also in the experimental phase?
> >
> > Yes. E.g if we think scalable mode is mature, we can enable 3.0.
>
> Sorry to come back to the discussion late..
>
> I'd say unless someone (or some organization) strongly ask for a stable
> interface for scalable mode (better with some developer looking after it
> along with the organization), until then we start with versioning.
>
> Otherwise I hope we can be free to break the interface assuming things are
> still evolving, just like the spec.

Right, according to the discussion, as long as we don't think it's
mature enough to be capable of version X. We won't introduce the
version.

Thanks

>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>