From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120413221700.GF1680@joana> References: <1334243001-17016-1-git-send-email-s.syam@samsung.com> <1334243001-17016-27-git-send-email-s.syam@samsung.com> <20120413221700.GF1680@joana> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:13:44 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Bluetooth: Remove unused hci_le_ltk_reply() From: Andre Guedes To: Gustavo Padovan , Syam Sidhardhan , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Vinicius Gomes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Syam/Gustavo, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > Hi Syam, > > * Syam Sidhardhan [2012-04-12 20:33:17 +0530]: > >> In this API, we were using sizeof operator for an array >> given as function argument, which is invalid. >> However this API is not used anywhere. >> >> Signed-off-by: Syam Sidhardhan >> --- >>  include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |    1 - >>  net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c         |   16 ---------------- >>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >> index c0b232c..6e170de 100644 >> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >> @@ -1069,7 +1069,6 @@ void hci_le_conn_update(struct hci_conn *conn, u16 min, u16 max, >>                                       u16 latency, u16 to_multiplier); >>  void hci_le_start_enc(struct hci_conn *conn, __le16 ediv, __u8 rand[8], >>                                                       __u8 ltk[16]); >> -void hci_le_ltk_reply(struct hci_conn *conn, u8 ltk[16]); > > I'll let Andre comment here, I'm not sure if this is going to be used on > the future or not. I'm not sure too, I think Vinicius can tell more about that. Regarding the memcpy call, yes, it is definitely bogus. Regards, Andre