From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC09C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C01C610A1 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343603AbhIAPSe (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:18:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40510 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233464AbhIAPSc (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D629C061575 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id s12so5679611ljg.0 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:17:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/GGmOUmP/HWfyFYlF4fSiVjkuTnkEVuMct1cxrvUQZ4=; b=NmEmdHPJEhOBweZo8F+2InfFyID4brlXdOBGB3F9Wn66QGiotlqQzBoHBUKcN9nDjm 2hWvPwkxOX6dU3PFew4NiENqTCTuHwkE4DzRlNjuidyLBg7iepn6TGXAMlOv9FfcLAdA XRKAnrDf3ChNzZSUNf+uhaY7tmRlLTOYa7KhpAaESisk/daem0ShsCimR1i+yJT8m3H/ s2h3JvJH2wL94PIZ+NMDmB/G1xsym0azMewbFd/wUac7nLlkJftlS4G6q4WbfT10JOpX WutEwH912hhtBRuWN7Bt78ZsZwmH5MjKL6iD3oGkz46yq9EqcAgbrKRQmNrtlmfr6VRW fF5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/GGmOUmP/HWfyFYlF4fSiVjkuTnkEVuMct1cxrvUQZ4=; b=dcKJnZRQX+qcaZ3DQitb9B4Su5O1D5/8kgXd4V73K3G/Tsr1KapBUT0xdgiHFnjNBl /HmU6GbIdSoP81zuK/XYR31nwxvFTw0P3qVoaqujV4YQ7rhR3tKRnWEHoBXq7HWWnVmt 7C/3krl///mKHKqMnuGIQu0UswivZF4ZCJjhBI1MzizG6lb6Sydbfbl4aRVe5asodT+y 3v4TrDMbh7O9B8u+Wu642bVvw++5JUfcfEML8HZMDN0Lkjz/aW4WR4JNhCV56EngaKEt AFtCBj+fza6TR5L6nryHC2h4pBiG8NTFRW0XKAvUazvDaVnqADDO1skB04Z1mKE63JEi dLGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KNCkqTycQPYcmlgxXC2rjBWO1kgm4tYlXXKPcRVQ6LQzKxOvP X16fXLPb2ILEifmRcMGvqarENDhr8X+n9ZEByMM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGhbYmqggX6Td/rXLB0q2ecWWWJ4iiAUmGvOSrF2WPKOc+BlXbemEYM8qOQ2zYaC4yHgAKLxXQHtw+3qVGcBk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9296:: with SMTP id d22mr110958ljh.413.1630509453492; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:17:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210831051037.3108944-1-daeho43@gmail.com> <33e7e327-5318-e30f-4419-42497fe90b31@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <33e7e327-5318-e30f-4419-42497fe90b31@kernel.org> From: Daeho Jeong Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:17:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com, Daeho Jeong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode == FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_SEG)? > > It needs to randomize position of next segment only in fragment_seg mode? IIRC. > I want the randomness of segment allocation in fragment:*_block mode to simulate real filesystem fragmentation. How about just using fragment:rand_block for the simulation. I mean we can use segment randomness for fragment:segment and fragment:rand_block. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E063C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32E06108E for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:17:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E32E06108E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRzl-0005eD-9h; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:17:45 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRzj-0005e7-Ig for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:17:43 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/GGmOUmP/HWfyFYlF4fSiVjkuTnkEVuMct1cxrvUQZ4=; b=PnA8cO4JGfJgNNxj0omHv6JOry CO03vrcc5QlzhzsyUqxGpfJqHHKZwMDK3s5L2F4hnrmzM4C5Saof0lWCiMmztVyeV3mTVDIj68Kps iteRuLbsK1/ta+B8B7+8W+pFD4heSHrRDiMg9N3ovpY8kKbJu0gi1VbPPYgzNsueVqPw=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/GGmOUmP/HWfyFYlF4fSiVjkuTnkEVuMct1cxrvUQZ4=; b=Nu2NUDiwPdXVSDFuinejYIcQkQ RbTFGCTvJ+lChko2VKkgn7/ZTq7sgGF9b17lQIyS2OaUy4Pb1TjMq5nHIOKHjpCOWX6ck9yJCI7P7 9y6NThSGksMZ72P36KOIJy7fbgZTe9CtXbHd6MIRWMYNe5qEQHQkvM34L5Mjb8p26oBE=; Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com ([209.85.208.176]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1mLRzg-00039b-9X for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:17:43 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id h1so5549132ljl.9 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:17:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/GGmOUmP/HWfyFYlF4fSiVjkuTnkEVuMct1cxrvUQZ4=; b=NmEmdHPJEhOBweZo8F+2InfFyID4brlXdOBGB3F9Wn66QGiotlqQzBoHBUKcN9nDjm 2hWvPwkxOX6dU3PFew4NiENqTCTuHwkE4DzRlNjuidyLBg7iepn6TGXAMlOv9FfcLAdA XRKAnrDf3ChNzZSUNf+uhaY7tmRlLTOYa7KhpAaESisk/daem0ShsCimR1i+yJT8m3H/ s2h3JvJH2wL94PIZ+NMDmB/G1xsym0azMewbFd/wUac7nLlkJftlS4G6q4WbfT10JOpX WutEwH912hhtBRuWN7Bt78ZsZwmH5MjKL6iD3oGkz46yq9EqcAgbrKRQmNrtlmfr6VRW fF5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/GGmOUmP/HWfyFYlF4fSiVjkuTnkEVuMct1cxrvUQZ4=; b=MQUcn8xG1ki2X3yHPVUOfBnaRen+OalLvB5CcRuKMotFC3belXh+dj5aMFSLgp2doz cQGzC2vvkbl/BU24w7taYx20WpLYlZia5otsWKfY9HnOkGHtiM7JWOePIck8FNUf9J/H L6Id+HfTc9VMRyl2mm8s090SpW4r6SF2ngRMdH6E4WKc2g2NIHNGkMteNoJYkuJeAI+i ILQ0/YDXUZveTKE1CUBBd24aRcynQ42U4KfIUEVfP7xkuj5+EKbgAS+abPL0Q444mcwQ Ly9in929Hv32yD543d2qCAtIdaBTagnR7RPIo4zR4gHIsHm3ChmPXXQWgx+3K/PVDPLe alrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zPK/hfp1/rbCnNs6LqdqE1dGnZXsrkgBl8xeFqEm2LWs3Adpq 6/4aIh5Inq8mS5G8TC8tBkLWISR0E1YA0gqASeh1wJ3ABdc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGhbYmqggX6Td/rXLB0q2ecWWWJ4iiAUmGvOSrF2WPKOc+BlXbemEYM8qOQ2zYaC4yHgAKLxXQHtw+3qVGcBk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9296:: with SMTP id d22mr110958ljh.413.1630509453492; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:17:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210831051037.3108944-1-daeho43@gmail.com> <33e7e327-5318-e30f-4419-42497fe90b31@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <33e7e327-5318-e30f-4419-42497fe90b31@kernel.org> From: Daeho Jeong Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:17:21 -0700 Message-ID: To: Chao Yu X-Headers-End: 1mLRzg-00039b-9X Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daeho Jeong , kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > > if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode == FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_SEG)? > > It needs to randomize position of next segment only in fragment_seg mode? IIRC. > I want the randomness of segment allocation in fragment:*_block mode to simulate real filesystem fragmentation. How about just using fragment:rand_block for the simulation. I mean we can use segment randomness for fragment:segment and fragment:rand_block. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel