From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com (mail-yw0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3whk7G1cLbzDqL0 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:38:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KqaTSvXg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id w143so2976827yww.1 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:38:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=oe6IfcXrMF7PM4rK3tS6seWFaaGVbvJzpuEV/h+54u4=; b=KqaTSvXg44A5G0VyTUCuYbrNlf/ZMfd2tbSZF+cYPYYF0fpxauyXJ3awbAgs6WerEH a1CJK/nH5jiG7s4jYZgus9ofVanmQwMpq68PqBJRzBJrKsVaFEeXnMVGAArOUw7kOH/N xvQubVs4nxFPJ9EEuJjyoXOJhRl4alAXEdmhEvctZTa2wf5CilCbmwuup4hOUNubXmtN 2Oq+0Z8kfYGbFOcgtWAvFouHdHjK8AmZW9ozIyH8eXZ4JrH4DpXtEqcOh5koByva4Fo9 VhILgG5B+N3HFzg6afI7v+QY2C5zDXa6J2+DZ5B4M4x424nFBkJcS5M/wJJ9HTlHAOHH C0Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oe6IfcXrMF7PM4rK3tS6seWFaaGVbvJzpuEV/h+54u4=; b=i3gfH8VXPQrrddxm3S/wSXChszOHqGEv5AnLZooPve00qITQiK3XMP2MyoETy1QuIk V7H8N9bj5dV1vEQARVkNsxgjwSodh+O90ZgmtSOWxzU9TUqKS7qdHG4ytRwOcgZ4YyZf rfRKspEipzBfxRMKePMs9KgZAAfqF9Mp6iixlme1W8NCpJlCf2nGLitIEMnAhSyQ54cv CM3ncpIj2ue80bdh6i1kLW8+vA90KLmv/u4GwOGXWZyG31XqlE2x2Szbq/ZB1kxBM/6v /R0WrTxPpWAQOUfw2mTtVp5/AuD1MQr836EMwKHYAY5MymYr9zgtq+FuI+56LxdkoqL5 1NKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAQEfxTaCT+L18Rp9FY1qZ/nTnxn1QcGbdGJD0mbeA1yn6UWYsS 2f+J2+1JVnzEPXiwEQIo78XDxqX8io0FTqk= X-Received: by 10.13.243.133 with SMTP id c127mr1777914ywf.43.1496734679181; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:37:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: joel.stan@gmail.com Received: by 10.37.174.2 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:37:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1496650682.8159.26.camel@aj.id.au> References: <20170505024227.30962-1-andrew@aj.id.au> <1496650682.8159.26.camel@aj.id.au> From: Joel Stanley Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:07:38 +0930 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ONmBDUvCWcpb72AiXz0Sm8OUUhw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH linux dev-4.10 v3 0/3] Clean up mach-aspeed/aspeed.c To: Andrew Jeffery Cc: OpenBMC Maillist , Brad Bishop , ken.th.liu@foxconn.com, john.hc.wang@foxconn.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:38:02 -0000 On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 12:12 +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Here's v3 of the series cleaning up the board file given functionality we now >> have in the tree. Between patches acked and applied from v1 and v2, there's >> only Barreleye left. I've dug into the archives and Cc'ed Ken and John so they >> can provide feedback if they have availability. >> >> A slip of the fingers meant that v2 didn't actually get Cc'ed to the list, so >> apologies for that. Xo kindly Cc'ed his replies so the acks at least saw the >> light of day. >> >> Again, the controversial patch is the debounce patch for BMC_PWBTN_IN_N, which >> changes how the GPIO is exposed to userspace (and so needs a corresponding >> userspace update). I'm hoping Brad can give feedback or start the discussion to >> coordinate the userspace change. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andrew >> > > Joel, I'd like to see at least the first two patches taken. Hopefully > some of the GPIO work that Brad was involved in can be applied to the > Barreleye userspace so we can also take the third patch. > >> Andrew Jeffery (3): >> aspeed: barreleye: Remove unnecessary GPIO configuration >> aspeed: barreleye: Passthrough debounce isn't required > > Take the above two with some testing. Those two have been merged into 4.10. They are not part of the kernel bump I sent today, but will be part of the next. >> aspeed: barreleye: Debounce BMC_PWBTN_IN_N through devicetree > > Take this one once we we're ready in userspace. Cool. Is there a ticket open to track that work? Cheers, Joel