From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78178C433EF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4K8RHz1DsMz3c1R for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 20:58:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=jms.id.au header.i=@jms.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=ikNtmJ68; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com; envelope-from=joel.stan@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=jms.id.au header.i=@jms.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=ikNtmJ68; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4K8RHF0BpBz3bk2 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 20:57:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id z66so3458835qke.10 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 01:57:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jms.id.au; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gafxsigEjvq3LkS14UT+dFcvWi6eNbUfAOVcgjNi5gs=; b=ikNtmJ68I53uv6GBbSM2L34Is4MAlOTBwCYx5ls0EivV50VLGOcg1T5GrUDMS+6O4d vzqzimGGBCxxfy0b+I3iKD/EQa7OTzJcnTzis/Phd0BUOOsTe9/6TRBsNd0cjawqV2w/ te7eF26utJ5yyzstQ/hSoTbk42Fdf8CQYneLg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gafxsigEjvq3LkS14UT+dFcvWi6eNbUfAOVcgjNi5gs=; b=JQbsFUt4Dqy9FzvOMOBpYzrWVopgLnJEsWrvLI7zGmc3Ofhjz1Ea+ikYn78dh20KVO Y3S86TjEtTR3ZUJesmTntvfjR8cRaqpdjPgRXaCVTNVoZcYdSvI3z7+bDDpUNi6v9G1d iODPfv89XKnh851RvfM+z2Y5rTKrxBHBkJ9oIVIiIj1Gc26NzRCnN+QllpgvHA5e6dcV rZ9VGIVSKe2nz463kjHY9mdAsRnAdfDr4fKYbZKpXmmhj59i29TkByu2Scu+XwJcp55S Fvk6Y1SM8DHo1seFpfffM9Fhz+IjkUiW3EW0eXabzG0r3IDEUz4OEc4BOY/fB97l+lhj VjXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+fyyyxgimPfROfmfH7zdy/eJZhZW1q5iBfjfYQ6OCMSTkZeKv yPzJGtJkLp0BVhHAwm4GdA9DQBxFaP3QW4uDMvw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfmLK0csn6uRrprnwcgTS41wbABhufnYmIBchb+iFYwoD6emuXp+41ArJna7exLBBm/kBjnIzkS/Y3quPa1Pk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2fc:b0:649:a4e:c430 with SMTP id a28-20020a05620a02fc00b006490a4ec430mr18704469qko.347.1646301444139; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 01:57:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220214094231.3753686-1-clg@kaod.org> <1cbb3001-f7ba-50bf-7184-3aec6342e405@kaod.org> <04785138-fa0d-568e-b47b-6d0c51cdc426@kaod.org> In-Reply-To: <04785138-fa0d-568e-b47b-6d0c51cdc426@kaod.org> From: Joel Stanley Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:57:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Call for testing: spi-mem driver for Aspeed SMC controllers To: =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ryan Chen , OpenBMC Maillist , Lei Yu , John Wang Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 09:51, C=C3=A9dric Le Goater wrote: > > > > Oh no! A failure! > > > > I ran it again and it succeeded. Both tests were with random data. I > > wrote to it a third time, this time restoring the original file, and > > it succeeded. > > and did you reboot ? :) > Yes. And I've re-flashed cs0 a few times running at 50MHz without issue.