On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:00 PM Kairui Song wrote: > > This patch series adds a .platform_trusted_keys in system_keyring as the > reference to .platform keyring in integrity subsystem, when platform > keyring is being initialized it will be updated, so it will be > accessable for verifying PE signed kernel image. > > This patch series let kexec_file_load use platform keyring as fall > back if it failed to verify the image against secondary keyring, > so the actually PE signature verify process will use keys provides > by firmware. > > After this patch kexec_file_load will be able to verify a signed PE > bzImage using keys in platform keyring. > > Tested in a VM with locally signed kernel with pesign and imported the > cert to EFI's MokList variable. > > To test this patch series on latest kernel, you need to ensure this commit > is applied as there is an regression bug in sanity_check_segment_list(): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id™3a110319a4a60aadbd02f6defdebe048f7773b > > Update from V4: > - Drop ifdef in security/integrity/digsig.c to make code clearer > - Fix a potential issue, set_platform_trusted_keys should not be > called when keyring initialization failed > > Update from V3: > - Tweak and simplify commit message as suggested by Mimi Zohar > > Update from V2: > - Use IS_ENABLED in kexec_file_load to judge if platform_trusted_keys > should be used for verifying image as suggested by Mimi Zohar > > Update from V1: > - Make platform_trusted_keys static, and update commit message as suggested > by Mimi Zohar > - Always check if platform keyring is initialized before use it > > Kairui Song (2): > integrity, KEYS: add a reference to platform keyring > kexec, KEYS: Make use of platform keyring for signature verify > > arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > certs/system_keyring.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > include/keys/system_keyring.h | 9 +++++++++ > include/linux/verification.h | 1 + > security/integrity/digsig.c | 3 +++ > 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 > Hi Mimi, I've updated the patch series again and as the code changed a bit I didn't include previous Reviewd-by / Tested-by, it worked with no problem, could you help have a review again? Thank you. -- Best Regards, Kairui Song