From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932982AbeBVPNH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:13:07 -0500
Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:39305 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932966AbeBVPNC (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:13:02 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226ntCCuLqY4Qjyny20F71wjJ7iYsNrr9gG7SXIvRexdfyVklAmLEb8DxLMgQsfVb4s5QMxEArdFQNLDaoAxHQM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180131022151.GA14668@sophia>
References: <cover.1514578085.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <CACRpkdbBA0DX22ZGSkQxi+euTSROPzsmLTvSPwY8peg6+7igFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180131022151.GA14668@sophia>
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:13:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY7JGmHO_oC6__+6+5ukJsThqq6Oy5u0+En01=DAN2owQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Change ISA_BUS_API dependency to selection
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:22 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:29:30AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:13 PM, William Breathitt Gray
>><vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Linus, please pickup this entire patchset through your GPIO subsystem
>>> tree; a recursive dependency error is present if these patches are
>>> cherry-picked (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/26/235), so they should
>>> be merged together in the same tree.
>>
>>OK I just need a bunch of ACKs so giving subsystem maintainers some
>>days to come back on this.
>>
>>Yours,
>>Linus Walleij
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> Do you have any objections to picking up this patchset now; or would you
> prefer to wait for some more input from the other maintainers?

No I will try to apply it and see what happens :)

Yours,
Linus Walleij