From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq/irq_sim: provide irq_sim_fire_edge() Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 23:26:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20181120134032.31645-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20181120134032.31645-2-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20181120171742.gkwb4s4qbcqvnefj@pengutronix.de> <20181121191509.ia2vcklvx4q2rh56@pengutronix.de> <20181125211854.idnqxz4pco3r7ydr@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Bartosz Golaszewski List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:14 PM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Thomas, Linus: after commit fa38869b0161 ("gpiolib: Don't support irq > sharing for userspace") some libgpiod tests are failing because we can > no longer depend on reading the value of a dummy GPIO after detecting > an interrupt to know the edge of the interrupt. While these interrupts > are triggered from debugfs and debugfs is not required to maintain > compatibility, I thing having a working test suite for the GPIO > subsystem and uAPI is worth applying these two patches and also the > previous one[1]. > > Can we have them applied for 4.20 or are there any objections? I'm fine with applying them if I can just get an ACK from one of the IRQ maintainers (Thomas, Marc). Yours, Linus Walleij