From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752319Ab2FKVBs (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:01:48 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]:58120 "EHLO mail-qa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120Ab2FKVBr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:01:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1339428307-3850-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1339428307-3850-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1339428307-3850-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:01:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] mfd: Initialise the DB8500 PRCMU driver at core_initcall time From: Linus Walleij To: Lee Jones , grant.likely@secretlab.ca Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, Samuel Ortiz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > Now the AB8500 has its own IRQ domain But that does not appear until patch 8 in this series? Are the patches in the wrong order? Or does this need rewording? > it needs to be initialised earlier > in the boot sequence. As the AB8500 relies on the DB8500 PRCMU we need to > reflect this change for the PRCMU driver too. Hm what shall we do when we run out of initlevels? I think this was the kind of thing that deferred probe should solve. Usually changing this kind of thing has side effects so I'm a bit hesitant. Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:01:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 06/14] mfd: Initialise the DB8500 PRCMU driver at core_initcall time In-Reply-To: <1339428307-3850-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1339428307-3850-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1339428307-3850-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > Now the AB8500 has its own IRQ domain But that does not appear until patch 8 in this series? Are the patches in the wrong order? Or does this need rewording? > it needs to be initialised earlier > in the boot sequence. As the AB8500 relies on the DB8500 PRCMU we need to > reflect this change for the PRCMU driver too. Hm what shall we do when we run out of initlevels? I think this was the kind of thing that deferred probe should solve. Usually changing this kind of thing has side effects so I'm a bit hesitant. Yours, Linus Walleij