From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F50C433EF for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 22:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236801AbhLSW2M (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:28:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231572AbhLSW2L (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:28:11 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9102C061574 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 14:28:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id x19-20020a9d7053000000b0055c8b39420bso10423724otj.1 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 14:28:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Mkxg9YJ1VUNW9qmT9GYUdbencxbQaI8+vpGFuN857BE=; b=bsNXll/bHGaJggVfU58Ha1TTohE2PIjEpdMrII86qh4TlsbdLkj/vQ7lTGk72wXb0W QJquPXFBXtbqZ5KZP+26rtFXenlYEI8UNimMOH4B232aQ66ZXw9jApcKQHEbg/xexERD qCcAwNGKbXX8y4ZW3lNzR4FQPDCh2UcSDePK3gSPpTeOc/mv4l9T78Bc/Crdaf6P9Pnh aLo/tXH8cSEV+BxV3He5NeRBmBk0Mukyk3qJxKcmpFoBUXvaRuRU/D/DQtE425mwoGGP THNi94HdYdfCDQzTSuo+kRYmIKkmQpVI/zNW/FDSGA5MsczPqP9Ktrkl4Av0fczn4hRV Xf7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mkxg9YJ1VUNW9qmT9GYUdbencxbQaI8+vpGFuN857BE=; b=u+IewFOurpeQ5pD88GiJJKL4aA0NL1BDPDUqlL+/zgew6l8fUzvSsSWAQvfbr2mi1w dp/VbLpDaMTQhaEZiXBwuQZhGnw+AyWH6WkDGBjsi2+QtWhyVFY8Qt8/N48RQxoNTSOe HyU69MTNETQnVEoYLOmeCZUO84oMsB0TzuOOxmqgpDL6YngsSJH7Rh5sfOGradVMVeJy cYXqex8NrAApSiEwFlsANix/uNi0sdNEF/Mhmac5F8Ffhp8ZTzHEUYI+TDE+ZoAgSwOd AgYO8iDa/sAuzCzVHT4G4aiQLsSEcpiqNd9k+c76U/guMt7VWuvVDNDbBrjQgB7iuiqb Fgng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LUdHLdBpO9msl5sIAb7Za0I8J9+GejO5CYK48X3l5CIUBJCNc Dxcs9bVpwvLkxVhFyQ0jTdgLXBX7ZGQSjEUNOxMOEQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypl0HuzptDxHHG0QPFV2dC/Q6Gvt2OImya+q5KQOGs1CjR14HO7XX62QLys+g7bLa0Fj7vJGBSFfBYZ1ZkmSQ= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:74d0:: with SMTP id a16mr9115873otl.237.1639952890935; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 14:28:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211216201342.25587-1-luizluca@gmail.com> <20211216201342.25587-2-luizluca@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:27:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek-smi: remove unsupported switches To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , vivien.didelot@gmail.com, Florian Fainelli , olteanv@gmail.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Alvin_=C5=A0ipraga?= , =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 7:12 AM Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: > However, it also gives the users a false expectative that it is > supported (it has happened to me a couple of times). I would not like > to simply drop this. How about adding a "(not supported)" comment. > Would it be acceptable? I don't see why users would get that idea. If they do not know the difference between device tree bindings and operating system implementations, I don't know how to fix that. Probably they simply have to ask and get the answer like with any other technical detail. Yours, Linus Walleij