From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753902Ab2E1GiN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2012 02:38:13 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]:38670 "EHLO mail-qa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753270Ab2E1GiK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2012 02:38:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120424143624.GB3438@kroah.com> References: <1335165396-23604-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20120423154342.GB23990@kroah.com> <20120424143624.GB3438@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:38:09 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] driver core: always handle dpm_order From: Linus Walleij To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rabin Vincent Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:11:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:16:36AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> >> From: Rabin Vincent >> >> >> >> If !dev->class, device_move() does not respect the dpm_order. >> >> Fix it to do so. >> >> >> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent >> >> Reviewed-by: Srinidhi Kasagar >> >> [Fixed a small dangling label compile warning] >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij >> >> --- >> >>  drivers/base/core.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> >>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> > >> > Is this a problem in 3.4?  Older kernels?  Or can it wait for 3.5? >> >> Rabin said earlier that it could wait for 3.4 atleast. > > That didn't answer my question at all.  Oh well, 3.5 it is... Is this going upstream in this merge window? I haven't seen it in Torvalds' tree, but I guess it may be pending for a late merge...? Yours, Linus Walleij