From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: make gpio numbering deterministical by using of aliases Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:30:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1465898604-16294-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20160615072404.GB26768@pengutronix.de> <20160615082705.GW22406@atomide.com> <5761265F.2050508@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:36745 "EHLO mail-oi0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750883AbcFRIaT (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2016 04:30:19 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id p204so148483450oih.3 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 01:30:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5761265F.2050508@ti.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Tony Lindgren , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , Alexandre Courbot , Linux-OMAP , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Sascha Hauer On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Wouldn't gpio-line-names be helpful for such cases as mentioned in [1],[2] > But I don't know it these properties were exposed in legacy GPIO sysfs interface also. The line names only expose through the chardev interface because the sysfs ABI is frozen and should not be extended. Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:30:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gpio: omap: make gpio numbering deterministical by using of aliases In-Reply-To: <5761265F.2050508@ti.com> References: <1465898604-16294-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20160615072404.GB26768@pengutronix.de> <20160615082705.GW22406@atomide.com> <5761265F.2050508@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Wouldn't gpio-line-names be helpful for such cases as mentioned in [1],[2] > But I don't know it these properties were exposed in legacy GPIO sysfs interface also. The line names only expose through the chardev interface because the sysfs ABI is frozen and should not be extended. Yours, Linus Walleij