From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50680C6379D for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93032086A for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="v3LtVA2V" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730537AbgKXI1V (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:27:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43128 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730500AbgKXI1U (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:27:20 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com (mail-lf1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 309C2C0613D6 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id s30so27684633lfc.4 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:27:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BBG2wuxnRkC9gcLJv65Hd93EbCvk6yLiiTuCJFuSKhA=; b=v3LtVA2V7vd+LPwQ55XgnwBWrfofD+uJMR3lP30KYtdZOmmzoekDfsQAx5cocCjoE8 1XuKNd05AYCLpk+nsqRuAxJksdfqhv0oQC0GArcAPAsWyy2XEbNRTSyWe9KVGtBND6Cf VGa8BfXKSjpG6HR8O6lx2efo3b1YnQp3HbgxH/o/WCzqdt1Cm7xJDdI7UvWqEgREJjBE R8dXJ99mbCA4emz7f9imBOH0YHPv3sX9L554J9B+JqxxvyrEOd/sS6oVUBSrAvZKAR5u Sr2oozJafHUpClT3La3xARkFRdCdius0zpYQLOh5Xbxg2/1qn7NNG+Py6uigLm27+55T PIjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BBG2wuxnRkC9gcLJv65Hd93EbCvk6yLiiTuCJFuSKhA=; b=JoKCcJ+mh8gTghxiJPhFDDYpknicFaWXltyjjMtPJ8ETUSj9htC/Q7/yPRKZ47Xypc qhnSxisymvoOlAOB8uRuO43zyp4uClrU2Dnb3HyCjyFoytmGUB0XdRryDi9xOD0ZwOBr b0P4H0UlCkP0Z0mHN8oHrREtGgxAO3ECaHwEHKhuybBCtM2yy9/kxXn2WAle2Ki4q7D0 oQe0wRu8ZP93Ee9PM3i3UOimDUoewNat+u3FzVkV0g9DE4xqy+0UXQ0KIkccX8RivgsP 1zhyBSbvAtqxJAsC0G7LHvM0kCX9/yAM6VI/+9AzCaslo++xY7mrAv5KbQ8zKfDPiGLA gr6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531l3OEKwoPTOe34S+7k27LbK39Gh9YX1Jwe+KAN0XrVLWkGKtC/ QuSeQYRIvQUAKLRfL6Taxdn9tuHRTsGDHOKe3e7yrA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhticdWKrjDkzF+0slKKn4WLxmhg8anIrWRKz+5xkruyZ3CncU+SLWT7saZibhsIMQAsaWX795xF2f1l30hZY= X-Received: by 2002:a19:7b06:: with SMTP id w6mr1407528lfc.260.1606206438621; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:27:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201123160139.1.I2702919afc253e2a451bebc3b701b462b2d22344@changeid> <20201123160139.3.I771b6594b2a4d5b7fe7e12a991a6640f46386e8d@changeid> In-Reply-To: <20201123160139.3.I771b6594b2a4d5b7fe7e12a991a6640f46386e8d@changeid> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:27:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Clear possible pending irq when remuxing GPIOs To: Douglas Anderson Cc: Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Maulik Shah , Srinivas Ramana , Neeraj Upadhyay , Rajendra Nayak , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , MSM , Bjorn Andersson , Stephen Boyd , Andy Gross , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:02 AM Douglas Anderson wrote: > Conceptually, we can envision the input on Qualcomm SoCs to pass > through a bunch of blocks between coming into the chip and becoming a > GPIO interrupt. This looks like really good detective engineering, something I do myself from time to time. Bjorn does this look OK to you? I'm wondering about patch 1/3, does it need to be applied with the rest? Yours, Linus Walleij