From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:54:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1447869580-10416-1-git-send-email-afd@ti.com> <20151124162624.GI807@x1> <20151204120240.GW26072@sirena.org.uk> <5665E4F7.1070707@ti.com> <20151208191657.GA5727@sirena.org.uk> <56703CCC.5060608@ti.com> <20160111073811.GA3331@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160111073811.GA3331@x1> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Alexandre Courbot , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> >> > Is there anything I can do to help this along? This series >> > and the tps65086 series have been blocked for months on >> > trivial issues. (Not sure why the tps65086 hasn't been taken, >> > it doesn't have this problem, I'd be OK with this getting >> > stalled for a bit longer if someone could look at the other >> > one) >> >> Lee can you merge the core driver if it's OK? Then we have >> includes etc in place to merge subdrivers for the next merge >> window. > > It's made more complex than that, due to patch 2 removing code from > all subsystems. We probably need to take this in in its entirety, no? You know way better than me :) go ahead with the best solution from the MFD point of view I'd say. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752722AbcANIyd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:54:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:32898 "EHLO mail-ob0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091AbcANIyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:54:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160111073811.GA3331@x1> References: <1447869580-10416-1-git-send-email-afd@ti.com> <20151124162624.GI807@x1> <20151204120240.GW26072@sirena.org.uk> <5665E4F7.1070707@ti.com> <20151208191657.GA5727@sirena.org.uk> <56703CCC.5060608@ti.com> <20160111073811.GA3331@x1> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:54:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support From: Linus Walleij To: Lee Jones Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Alexandre Courbot , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> >> > Is there anything I can do to help this along? This series >> > and the tps65086 series have been blocked for months on >> > trivial issues. (Not sure why the tps65086 hasn't been taken, >> > it doesn't have this problem, I'd be OK with this getting >> > stalled for a bit longer if someone could look at the other >> > one) >> >> Lee can you merge the core driver if it's OK? Then we have >> includes etc in place to merge subdrivers for the next merge >> window. > > It's made more complex than that, due to patch 2 removing code from > all subsystems. We probably need to take this in in its entirety, no? You know way better than me :) go ahead with the best solution from the MFD point of view I'd say. Yours, Linus Walleij