All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Linux Input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	platform-driver-x86 <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: of: Don't return 0 on dt_gpio_count()
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:43:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZb2hcgp7L=1YLHwpoqzzZ0sSdXzk9AP++oSys_uVqmyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170220161549.39490-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> It's unusual to have error checking like (ret <= 0) in cases when
> counting GPIO resources. In case when it's mandatory we propagate the
> error (-ENOENT), otherwise we don't use the result.
>
> This makes consistent behaviour across all possible variants called in
> gpiod_count().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-20 16:15 [PATCH v1 0/4] gpio: make gpiod_count() API consistent Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] gpio: acpi: Don't return 0 on acpi_gpio_count() Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-14  9:43   ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-14 11:51     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-03-16 14:42   ` Linus Walleij
2017-02-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: of: Don't return 0 on dt_gpio_count() Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-16 14:43   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2017-02-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] platform/x86: surface3_button: Propagate error from gpiod_count() Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-14  9:46   ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-14 12:28     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-16 14:45   ` Linus Walleij
2017-02-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] Input: soc_button_array - " Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-23  8:40   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-16 14:46   ` Linus Walleij
2017-02-27  8:27 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] gpio: make gpiod_count() API consistent Benjamin Tissoires
2017-02-28  9:48   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-14  9:49     ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdZb2hcgp7L=1YLHwpoqzzZ0sSdXzk9AP++oSys_uVqmyw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.