From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74A9C433E6 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749BC22EBF for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726469AbhAEWgM (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:36:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48448 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730727AbhAEWgM (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:36:12 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9B1C061798 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:35:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id h205so2237605lfd.5 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:35:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ahZlAn0+MJ2JO85Il4zqrFNJA3yrxvXOMtixl0o8ZDM=; b=xuV05iXPoA0k4FUH7uDKhum9x67A5+g0WrawAcxr+1nwNNKfzDFFhw6RcXhGVjrdAG DIPpNcT0tMeqTolY+1UHSqvl7wF97ndSycgqsK5KNZXYOFouXEAZcmV0db14uxPi/xTw fkiZrDeIfCVzxFPh/s6f5MjQjTE3FbzD//H1CaneHnQ65EKqNmVFIkbD/Q8s3qRbnfpF oeHplvWvkyArKkqqQjholOIaGROH0SMwCIhye89WnfvVn9lg7Rsy+dje5qrZY0xghJSO IVRZp+VQXtSVeFeCiWvHmfOs8HhPvx9IfbltAGF1/00sbuHYdVKbwxTKfWFe05h5vvVQ dbQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ahZlAn0+MJ2JO85Il4zqrFNJA3yrxvXOMtixl0o8ZDM=; b=kwsiLfoYDk37c4uVROZcRtr1FggQuOtcgc1zFgPBa07zVa+mwmnhV322m1Hbm3fie3 +ZeD8R5An6sC6M4X6hyRJ5LzETmNVt28mGRHKaC8zwYJjVvXz9qMcXRWeyQRA9CYe6gW QH73ZqtMo/upi0Dr5CiiZaSyfPGv2kE2nk5RyVvqaCq9sFsyT4uFidNsDBmi5TR3HmWX n3ti3uY14jy339QQHjVXiDuQU1wl8d6yRtH4qo7i1G9lxTuS1fXRroPpUvye3QOpYCCx bodDOWvzlOYqnJHlk+0PxRuayQz1ro3rvxgnm9klEcfyFbxMRWRRfLshrZJhK+gZxIAI EK7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qZB17vJACtzokVZXFu0J08VIEwRH+0d8wYC0uAN4HwY85nLqE NlkndDXu7uY/wJC72ouGrUIX9lSpiDsU84szJoBBEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKIX1tyqxO7DBuxtMjhEds0Yt3Gvxf2kvrIu6dSu4kg7r3sapM7iAm3kjKr+iyrDzk5lF6EH5VLy/XUJEFifg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9dc3:: with SMTP id x3mr800336ljj.326.1609886124436; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:35:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210103100007.32867-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20210103100007.32867-3-samuel@sholland.org> In-Reply-To: <20210103100007.32867-3-samuel@sholland.org> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:35:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] pinctrl: sunxi: h6-r: Add s_rsb pin functions To: Samuel Holland Cc: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Philipp Zabel , Andre Przywara , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux ARM , linux-clk , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-sunxi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 11:00 AM Samuel Holland wrote: > As there is an RSB controller in the H6 SoC, there should be some pin > configuration for it. While no such configuration is documented, the > "s_i2c" pins are suspiciously on the "alternate" function 3, with no > primary function 2 given. This suggests the primary function for these > pins is actually RSB, and that is indeed the case. > > Add the "s_rsb" pin functions so the RSB controller can be used. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland Is it OK if I just apply this patch to the pinctrl tree? Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C79C433E0 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B82CD22D6E for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:37:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B82CD22D6E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gb/PQxWxoEEdjCrHyzD4Acj+rG1QxqZAsRoLB8BtV+Y=; b=mcOGeMtXZRmWc8sol4SGkpwBs ckZ6YIF3PKp0JxppEVl+Ojnpyz3zk1nH/I7esb3T+Wigh2wWg/87ArwsjxWAaJYtRCxpxkaTmg9LH e/yTFuMAoFzBONMCTK2eBlObQTm/DCDuTuOc2YjIvleWhOlLvhUDZwlxQ1lywyE3ldCsibLkW/Riu KzLio9YdiSxQDKAsE1bzjviLrrQp9LQZZeB/V5M2BlmDSMTlczbhbzDIzARzNOSY+ViTX53ZjRrJu WOVAMdrbmMQqgeT6po5ecu6dDbNMTo4UCC6XvtrWCTiQPNuU1qoydUI85rJPDPt5QhMlvY2JQIZZh +pO5qjEAw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kwuvI-0008RQ-Ix; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 22:35:28 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kwuvF-0008Qf-Tf for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 22:35:26 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id x20so2137200lfe.12 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:35:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ahZlAn0+MJ2JO85Il4zqrFNJA3yrxvXOMtixl0o8ZDM=; b=xuV05iXPoA0k4FUH7uDKhum9x67A5+g0WrawAcxr+1nwNNKfzDFFhw6RcXhGVjrdAG DIPpNcT0tMeqTolY+1UHSqvl7wF97ndSycgqsK5KNZXYOFouXEAZcmV0db14uxPi/xTw fkiZrDeIfCVzxFPh/s6f5MjQjTE3FbzD//H1CaneHnQ65EKqNmVFIkbD/Q8s3qRbnfpF oeHplvWvkyArKkqqQjholOIaGROH0SMwCIhye89WnfvVn9lg7Rsy+dje5qrZY0xghJSO IVRZp+VQXtSVeFeCiWvHmfOs8HhPvx9IfbltAGF1/00sbuHYdVKbwxTKfWFe05h5vvVQ dbQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ahZlAn0+MJ2JO85Il4zqrFNJA3yrxvXOMtixl0o8ZDM=; b=nyAnJk39ei/e5MCFz7HF5hi9EkUs0Aj6BhQAfCu5pNFiL1wCgia5DQHLpQ0vzSrfUL KEIt80RA0KekXdsU1o7Wt6o1LzkfMCooaDc9gXQSU4AlxzqKiMiiNKZiJ0YXhOQoLypF o63rPxwHWK0ixXJDNKdFC8EbhRgPAcJg8wsASRmr1Y0F3eZz+ISGvhiOcbYcZ47Isyo3 gaxTJT5mSlTQ8WNMIoLvvqK8VciRXc+NYeJN5XpWONz36YVK6u15/wRBJCaPUwpwvTZE 9VJZdAcTwt9M+Igxx2R3acq1a72Qo6r6PpdS6SUspLc5Ksnvqhej+yzjuOdi/cg+JB7C PARg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GnOaMQuxCcTp/UYcMZmwmyHl9BAKFAn8P/VJOIG6Eu/dJOofZ wSjMUh+xnIQdWj5UuZ4Wi3IFunp5WBS3V+F/QpECuQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKIX1tyqxO7DBuxtMjhEds0Yt3Gvxf2kvrIu6dSu4kg7r3sapM7iAm3kjKr+iyrDzk5lF6EH5VLy/XUJEFifg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9dc3:: with SMTP id x3mr800336ljj.326.1609886124436; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:35:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210103100007.32867-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20210103100007.32867-3-samuel@sholland.org> In-Reply-To: <20210103100007.32867-3-samuel@sholland.org> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:35:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] pinctrl: sunxi: h6-r: Add s_rsb pin functions To: Samuel Holland X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210105_173525_977863_81087DE4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Jernej Skrabec , Stephen Boyd , Andre Przywara , Michael Turquette , linux-sunxi , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Maxime Ripard , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Chen-Yu Tsai , Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , linux-clk , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 11:00 AM Samuel Holland wrote: > As there is an RSB controller in the H6 SoC, there should be some pin > configuration for it. While no such configuration is documented, the > "s_i2c" pins are suspiciously on the "alternate" function 3, with no > primary function 2 given. This suggests the primary function for these > pins is actually RSB, and that is indeed the case. > > Add the "s_rsb" pin functions so the RSB controller can be used. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland Is it OK if I just apply this patch to the pinctrl tree? Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel