From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI / gpio: Allow holes in list of GPIOs for a device Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:10:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160929133944.158596-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20160929133944.158596-5-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160929133944.158596-5-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alexandre Courbot , ACPI Devel Maling List , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Make it possible to have an empty GPIOs in a GPIO list for device. For > example a SPI master may use both GPIOs and native pins as chip selects and > we need to be able to distinguish between the two. > > This makes it mandatory to have exactly 3 arguments for GPIOs and then > converts gpiolib to use of __acpi_node_get_property_reference() instead. In > addition we make acpi_gpio_package_count() to handle holes as well (this > matches the DT version). > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Looks OK. Do I need someone's ACK to merge stuff under Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt? Like Rafael? Yours, Linus Walleij