All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: accel: bma180: Fix BMA25x bandwidth register values
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 14:12:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZweO5kCdSky8Nc+QmKWRuGLKX4QEct5LmH4RTPirRLhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526094408.34298-2-stephan@gerhold.net>

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:44 AM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> wrote:

> According to the BMA253 datasheet [1] and BMA250 datasheet [2] the
> bandwidth value for BMA25x should be set as 01xxx:
>
>   "Settings 00xxx result in a bandwidth of 7.81 Hz; [...]
>    It is recommended [...] to use the range from ´01000b´ to ´01111b´
>    only in order to be compatible with future products."
>
> However, at the moment the drivers sets bandwidth values from 0 to 6,
> which is not recommended and always results into 7.81 Hz bandwidth
> according to the datasheet.
>
> Fix this by introducing a bw_offset = 8 = 01000b for BMA25x,
> so the additional bit is always set for BMA25x.
>
> [1]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bma253-ds000.pdf
> [2]: https://datasheet.octopart.com/BMA250-Bosch-datasheet-15540103.pdf
>
> Cc: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Fixes: 2017cff24cc0 ("iio:bma180: Add BMA250 chip support")
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>

Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

> After spending some more time with the driver I noticed that BMA253/BMA254
> would actually be better supported by the bmc150-accel driver (which
> doesn't have this problem and also supports the motion trigger/interrupt).
>
> I'm preparing a separate patch set to move BMA254 to bmc150-accel at least,
> but I'm not sure about BMA250 so this patch is relevant anyway. And I had
> it almost done already, so I thought it's better to send it. :)

I looked at the preliminary patches and this looks really good
too.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-26 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-26  9:44 [PATCH 0/2] iio: accel: bma180: Fix BMA25x bandwidth selection Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-26  9:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: accel: bma180: Fix BMA25x bandwidth register values Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-26 12:12   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2021-06-03 17:12     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-11 18:14       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-05-26  9:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: accel: bma180: Add missing 500 Hz / 1000 Hz bandwidth Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-26 12:12   ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-03 17:13     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACRpkdZweO5kCdSky8Nc+QmKWRuGLKX4QEct5LmH4RTPirRLhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.