From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B00C43603 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62537206D3 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="xMTLZBe9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727269AbfLPKTS (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 05:19:18 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com ([209.85.217.65]:39419 "EHLO mail-vs1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727226AbfLPKTS (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 05:19:18 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id p21so3755876vsq.6 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 02:19:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ueDedzI946XH4PwhczhGeVD5DlLhpVlGlKAyHYsNtI4=; b=xMTLZBe9EHbZSuDD63/fynjBq0TMvoIuWQ2+Dk5OTT8tQ4Zuo3Cy9HImD3UWs5kLKj E4A0y7sKPT5+yPfjFyjJ7oHj8z1mCgWU5d+xPUuMK7ASBydMJpQ6lfFj8cEl9LsnWSgY VpnrjZqhGsHjJeQ6v8kocpglYnRSgLWBTANs1jQM9sOFKlTVUKGSIQ4KAuiKiaX0x+c2 fqibsiogCi/u6AdiPCoRX0kgFt2oHdSDZh7+SzFqBX+hbyUke1edkmGrRoIRPRAvNg55 WhKITFUqStneT8rBJUjFtU4egb9jtGKhQw5Gv/9AZcNDUgvKnraUSpNO7qtHxskWSQDA kGNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ueDedzI946XH4PwhczhGeVD5DlLhpVlGlKAyHYsNtI4=; b=Z/oAoTuQxfhp71rWsm4ELT0HStCP77JGvjsCam2ZQv9NhGL6lrgHd3nrGmfmItakOh aAfzn41CMB292ZM4RD14wB1og7d+82Lo/Q1PhVYTrcj+6FC3b6HMbKcWNs1mQ3jYcm/d cQod5VggUy0/zHVtvenLNa/XFtA6NRUrKqWbS7JFMrM8nHqjRseq8PkVhuFKQpkUi+yQ mdSfyC0rIHsAzKwp6RuC1Tw42ir88+sezQJtHHZ/kacbDDQ5SKBZToastMY33vHn0jDl GrbYOC9ifNwc6kJOgXWnGPeIVPoQSAg26pCr/7vdYggOA9g1o0gIxvTVIfbVwJSV0hqO Nj4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUPPKIsCgp6iAfsszOy9JzQpV9cps4XY3nJyUti9RqsBJyHfhaI 1rRdd4in4mB3jpqmtgyQdDbPtM82Zrq4grOiIRmRaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxU/gsQDQg+UNwUJ5SeGezCQPaVBedec32xSUzB+8OIBESUkr8UHH8x2mW1oxPqPqmPbBDRtHMDadQ8H2wzpYo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:d592:: with SMTP id m18mr20877265vsj.85.1576491557076; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 02:19:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191209130926.86483-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20191213144431.GV32742@smile.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20191213144431.GV32742@smile.fi.intel.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:19:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] pinctrl: intel: Move Lynxpoint to pin control umbrella To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Mika Westerberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:44 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > If you want to make my life simple could you do this: > > I want, though I think above makes it harder. I'll not expecting any patches > against gpio-lynxpoint.c (and if they will be an author should Cc me anyway). > Besides the series nicely grouped on top of prerequisites which are solely > Intel pin control (no need for GPIO). Thus I prefer to send simple 1 PR during > this cycle to pin control subsystem and that's it. Fair enough, if you are convinced that will work then go ahead. Yours, Linus Walleij