From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932499AbcCKOx6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:53:58 -0500
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]:35380 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932185AbcCKOxv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:53:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160311111714.GC3450@infradead.org>
References: <1454364778-25179-1-git-send-email-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
	<1454364778-25179-10-git-send-email-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
	<20160211222210.GC3741@mtj.duckdns.org>
	<8FDE2B10-9BD2-4741-917F-5A37A74E5B58@linaro.org>
	<20160217170206.GU3741@mtj.duckdns.org>
	<72E81252-203C-4EB7-8459-B9B7060029C6@linaro.org>
	<20160301184656.GI3965@htj.duckdns.org>
	<CACRpkdYOjf3ZJsE4_EXiq0O-GoCje_FX9Q8A5JN+KcyBdtkZyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160304173947.GA16764@infradead.org>
	<CACRpkdZugGOPkYaKnQjY-SJ5-+OCiv_mmWvd3=eM=_ACd+UQQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160311111714.GC3450@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:53:50 +0700
Message-ID: <CACRpkda8r-=vjXH8TnR19vjY3cwKKH0tb8UWdkfpHpwV9U0_aw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>,
        Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> We use blkj-mq for single queue devices as well, in fact most consumers
> are single queue.  MMC is a prime candidate that hould move over soon.

OK we should do that with some before-and-after tests and see what
happens.

Yours,
Linus Walleij