From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add support for Allwinner R40 SoC Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:56:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170217173722.6477-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> Reply-To: linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20170217173722.6477-1-icenowy-ymACFijhrKM@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Icenowy Zheng Cc: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-clk , linux-sunxi List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > This patchset is an experiment to add R40 support to mainline Linux. > > As we have still no user manual for R40, the patchset is developed > by reading the BSP source code and device tree, educated guess and > try and error. Out of curiosity: does the board support use the mainline drivers as starting point? I.e. does it build on top of the community work done by Maxime & others? Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170217173722.6477-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> References: <20170217173722.6477-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:56:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add support for Allwinner R40 SoC To: Icenowy Zheng List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-sunxi , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Chen-Yu Tsai , Maxime Ripard , linux-clk , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+mturquette=baylibre.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > This patchset is an experiment to add R40 support to mainline Linux. > > As we have still no user manual for R40, the patchset is developed > by reading the BSP source code and device tree, educated guess and > try and error. Out of curiosity: does the board support use the mainline drivers as starting point? I.e. does it build on top of the community work done by Maxime & others? Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:56:30 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add support for Allwinner R40 SoC In-Reply-To: <20170217173722.6477-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> References: <20170217173722.6477-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > This patchset is an experiment to add R40 support to mainline Linux. > > As we have still no user manual for R40, the patchset is developed > by reading the BSP source code and device tree, educated guess and > try and error. Out of curiosity: does the board support use the mainline drivers as starting point? I.e. does it build on top of the community work done by Maxime & others? Yours, Linus Walleij