From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:57:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ARM: versatile: move CLCD configuration to device tree Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1454594660-7532-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <3695074.sKSIyOjpjD@wuerfel> <6859810.tb1t0IEONi@wuerfel> <56CC57FC.20707@ti.com> <56CC60C4.6040908@ti.com> <56CF2FB1.106@ti.com> <56D02D28.9080109@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <56D02D28.9080109@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Although one thing to consider is that if there is ever going to be a > DRM driver for CLCD, it would be good to have the device tree parts > correctly representing the hardware, so that the DRM driver could be > implemented in a cleaner, more generic way. OK so for the next kernel cycle I can work on that. The non-controversial patch set is essentially just using the DT bindings that are already in the kernel and in widespread use. See: commit d10715be03bd8bad59ddc50236cb140c3bd73c7b "video: ARM CLCD: Add DT support" They follow the example set by commit 478a4f81af4936c683a03488e15b087e28cb4f0d "ARM: vexpress: Add CLCD Device Tree properties" Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:57:38 +0700 Subject: [PATCH 11/11] ARM: versatile: move CLCD configuration to device tree In-Reply-To: <56D02D28.9080109@ti.com> References: <1454594660-7532-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <3695074.sKSIyOjpjD@wuerfel> <6859810.tb1t0IEONi@wuerfel> <56CC57FC.20707@ti.com> <56CC60C4.6040908@ti.com> <56CF2FB1.106@ti.com> <56D02D28.9080109@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Although one thing to consider is that if there is ever going to be a > DRM driver for CLCD, it would be good to have the device tree parts > correctly representing the hardware, so that the DRM driver could be > implemented in a cleaner, more generic way. OK so for the next kernel cycle I can work on that. The non-controversial patch set is essentially just using the DT bindings that are already in the kernel and in widespread use. See: commit d10715be03bd8bad59ddc50236cb140c3bd73c7b "video: ARM CLCD: Add DT support" They follow the example set by commit 478a4f81af4936c683a03488e15b087e28cb4f0d "ARM: vexpress: Add CLCD Device Tree properties" Yours, Linus Walleij