All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:47:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdadAUXgC-K6be6SFFn2ZTvCqkTK7VRJEzpFdUbybKc3YA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398266889-17489-2-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> descriptor-based API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

Are the DT bindings really full of such ambiguity between
singular and plural? Examples?

What happens in affected drivers today? It just doesn't work?

Does that mean these bindings are not actively used by any
drivers yet so we could augment the bindings instead, or are
they already deployed so we must implement this?

Would like a word from the DT people here...

>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 7a0b97076374..b991462c22fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2594,17 +2594,23 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
>                                       unsigned int idx,
>                                       enum gpio_lookup_flags *flags)
>  {
> +       static const char *suffixes[] = { "gpios", "gpio" };
>         char prop_name[32]; /* 32 is max size of property name */
>         enum of_gpio_flags of_flags;
>         struct gpio_desc *desc;
> +       unsigned int i;
>
> -       if (con_id)
> -               snprintf(prop_name, 32, "%s-gpios", con_id);
> -       else
> -               snprintf(prop_name, 32, "gpios");
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(suffixes); i++) {
> +               if (con_id)
> +                       snprintf(prop_name, 32, "%s-%s", con_id, suffixes[i]);
> +               else
> +                       snprintf(prop_name, 32, "%s", suffixes[i]);
>
> -       desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(dev->of_node, prop_name, idx,
> -                                       &of_flags);
> +               desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(dev->of_node, prop_name, idx,
> +                                               &of_flags);
> +               if (!IS_ERR(desc))
> +                       break;
> +       }

Code snippet left for reference on devicetree ML.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-24 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23 15:28 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: of: Remove unneeded dummy function Thierry Reding
2014-04-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names Thierry Reding
2014-04-24 12:47   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2014-04-24 14:06     ` Rob Herring
2014-04-24 18:22       ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-25 15:24         ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-02 22:22           ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-25  7:38       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-04-25  7:52   ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-02 23:04     ` Tony Lindgren
2014-06-02 23:14       ` Tony Lindgren
2014-06-04 13:08         ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-12  8:18         ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: of: Remove unneeded dummy function Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACRpkdadAUXgC-K6be6SFFn2ZTvCqkTK7VRJEzpFdUbybKc3YA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.