From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er169-0002jn-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:44:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er168-0006bH-AZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:44:41 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]:38194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er168-0006aQ-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:44:40 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id j7so3350649ita.3 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 04:44:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20180227104903.21353-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:44:38 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Versatile Express SiI9022 emulation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , Corey Minyard On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 10:48, Linus Walleij wrote: >> This series adds proper display bridge/connector emulation >> for the Versatile Express, implementing a simple Silicon >> Image 9022 emulation spawning a DDC I2C child. >> >> After the series the Versatile Express is successfully >> presented the "QEMU monitor" through DDC I2C. >> >> The series includes two refactorings from Corey and a >> minor bug fix for the i2c-ddc so that everything is smoothly >> integrated. >> >> Corey Minyard (2): >> i2c: Fix some brace style issues >> i2c: Move the bus class to i2c.h >> >> Linus Walleij (3): >> hw/i2c-ddc: Do not fail writes >> hw/sii9022: Add support for Silicon Image SII9022 >> arm/vexpress: Add proper display connector emulation > > Hi; I've applied this to target-arm.next with the tweak to > the commit message of patch 5 and the reset function in patch 4. > Let me know if you think those are wrong or you'd prefer to > respin the series yourself. I am certain you did it better than I could, thanks a lot. I forgot about the reset business, sorry :( I will test it once it hits the trunk! Yours, Linus Walleij