From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC5AC33C9E for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261E12080A for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="C98N7Pqf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727722AbgAGM5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 07:57:15 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:44015 "EHLO mail-lf1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727858AbgAGM5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 07:57:15 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 9so38796742lfq.10 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:57:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oNgwDBtA/tTrh9zrPV6+es+206sk4kdESZvdMawSVPY=; b=C98N7PqfhpnHkhM6Gwc1A+EaotJeLY+j05J84Zzs0uDh4X/KTZYZhQq/L+/ee502RW 0YnLtrYZUMKEl7fNKljOk3PlZ1ilpiPOyBfwkd1vr+VRgnPoAEh553NTAQHtoCAR4OaR rhqwSy2VuI7wSEWscWR+M3Ke4SL8MVyqS3ObsoQR8OxHOhOuUsZMlBIJOGP1KAZ5pEZd 1CbpSt92pPKv6kB0VKQnTx1DsGEtvk5jdAXZIRlkxIDqnLOTvgxCU3L8Ml052r/TC+d9 XZ8ITozFLg6ZK/AptYUIlmKOXtj5TKW5cPgKjVz6JTk/LDIkJrS8nduNEcIk6ARBOSef 3wGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oNgwDBtA/tTrh9zrPV6+es+206sk4kdESZvdMawSVPY=; b=KJkw/y8kOL9p3k9+eclbrqq5/IKraPn5zDjRHLwvqtlp3F4WP1jVrRM4uDZV7By9B/ g3KPYB+o3dD+9jMXoNkknzlx3EQCr2iKvARLA6rx7YKJ4A7rlq5IqJStQlg7yMVZ/hmj 0r/aLKUsQeXx6dNs/h2032Jbcal7d0mmZKJpibGGSDra8q0sYALQdbhX7oqvTvaw+Bmz MzFIjFyzX5hjX/yBkJO9wruuH7H1084fR8ei/EjfL0+W2jRAWVycRj+KPU/1F34Kqk8S kQ1AdVqGVjS9xnsF6et6SrbT1prlQfZuQMzCG3Q0WP5bNU5+5xQ9L6hJO87pS+7e6316 ojgA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlbzKrYVBo9jcxlPyC/T80RfOrybdb+GcE3S+MA9BdPsq/PrUt oaP3Dk1S3fixLofNcZQsCxVOyLVwoajwYSg1jFw5rw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzCq2tQrYgtWRpK3jplDj7YCPHm/vac42TUjOJ7mYyLMjr6dwz6nkOi9ak1FN3+t8xLYtvy7/Q+nNZoY/kIRis= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4945:: with SMTP id o5mr58554082lfi.93.1578401833587; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:57:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191227230447.32458-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200107123841.GE32742@smile.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:57:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: Do not clear IRQ flags on direct-irq enabled pins To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Hans de Goede , Mika Westerberg , Bastien Nocera , Dmitry Mastykin , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:38 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > Patch applied as non-critical fix for v5.6 with Mika's ACK. > > > (Tell me if it's critical.) > > > > Can we collect it in our tree (what we are consider a proper for this) and > > submit a PR? > > Sure that's true, I dropped the patch from my tree. > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij I also dropped the other Baytrail patch I shouldn't have picked up. (Replace WARN...) I blame coming back from vacation for misremembering how things work... Yours, Linus Walleij