From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A4EC33C8C for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5002D2075A for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="AEgy7ABR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727834AbgAGMzk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 07:55:40 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:42445 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727814AbgAGMzj (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 07:55:39 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id y19so38767259lfl.9 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:55:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/5M/Ch2CKDQ814/TnFy5fo83NcxCpktzh+5pz++zFSA=; b=AEgy7ABR047DoLjVm1VO0WwndfqDMR7kB3D+0j8w9A6HDCfcOm51PX/oqmApgcFxD3 PzDu3j2hDWa7nH3TzAI517R6JqnBHA52XvUN2mmJjhEfVTU06u7/K76rmzjQoGqKOT1w Cppn6/Y6kCgDnYae6PKPxT7a64fF9aEcAyvXIcx9q6Fc73emY3ZpIRrxApElzeX7qX2B Yfjz/EWvd8PkFd/7F4Mvv5eFqxG4t4eonMSAVE7GXnEtV6u4Z0MjRNWbXXTA8tB4UIlg +PGKIr1r+Ay4fZQov/DS0z6MzKi61kxcpE3KtW7XSMGyl1gj0nPhISsArIhce5H1nJux aTgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/5M/Ch2CKDQ814/TnFy5fo83NcxCpktzh+5pz++zFSA=; b=bDrdsC0nEyahtrKl9IsQyPs1iL/QMg37rAmrEpS6XZghhMXw5uFCtxo4B8fBfLHlBI r0xFMcvbiVaHLeYW1QjJ3Nkm67HTqUNYruw0Gy0vn/vRvo52gWvKnIlPTKHKsJU+mq36 4Py1z6uXrcPLF4T8iIMVi7dNEtK265IyMY67bKuW8FwMbL9aa0zFbeJ4nmWPG/mgTXup fQLudCDLRvDBlhIgGbuxf7E8LvkKHPyOQjqxjz4gN5VawJmEiAERMm0s2B0443FJA9vp GOzH8pxZMqHqFeD3EkbrlzbTCI1+Y+/9l4VVcs57W9RL3e1j5Pz6XFTxDM/F4ATDD4eV yyUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWjiRTNOnCEcC4X39LoDZAb0dk2wnhfrBbfJ/SS7jQMr3TxZ6GE FEHG20hdVna0agZYqG8XhxyJa5lXN1jVqLGmGPTZHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywW+1cO2Qz4LzNkTfh2xOv5aLJq+BCzv7q5D/XXcrloWHW/cXsbAUd1IJYb+6RnSPN6O161babyzIRRq1xBFE= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5c4b:: with SMTP id s11mr58716304lfp.133.1578401738382; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:55:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191227230447.32458-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200107123841.GE32742@smile.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200107123841.GE32742@smile.fi.intel.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:55:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: Do not clear IRQ flags on direct-irq enabled pins To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Hans de Goede , Mika Westerberg , Bastien Nocera , Dmitry Mastykin , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:38 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Patch applied as non-critical fix for v5.6 with Mika's ACK. > > (Tell me if it's critical.) > > Can we collect it in our tree (what we are consider a proper for this) and > submit a PR? Sure that's true, I dropped the patch from my tree. Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij