From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org by pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org (Dovecot) with LMTP id OPo1AJM2HlvXIAAAmS7hNA ; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:06 +0000 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4ADC60792; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.codeaurora.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="YMmVXlds" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FA4602FC; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 48FA4602FC Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932576AbeFKIrD (ORCPT + 20 others); Mon, 11 Jun 2018 04:47:03 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:39077 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932277AbeFKIrB (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2018 04:47:01 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id p185-v6so9942134itp.4 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:47:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AkI2wunLcbdl4vTNmZxdLodmrkYxkoL1UrCHhq3SLAU=; b=YMmVXldstAfC7pSqAz2P3/3Fg7HGTDOnvZN39ZiAYmR6QlWmQKuxYqFnbOZlE9eBAe V/FsTlbKf+ogha1MNMN85OrEqgSM3F55vVCizwmEM/Qa4TvwBSQRmV8kVwkuwK7wuvMq Prtf6tXvo3Cv1u3EzDNNO43gBPRD83ggAK8fI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AkI2wunLcbdl4vTNmZxdLodmrkYxkoL1UrCHhq3SLAU=; b=hoYxde3LsXV2ANFBlL/3yx4BewRJX+KTFDolZ4fnsK2RmjcOLrhs8dpG7PukC5d1fA zwbF1+DBI7CI2uja9G4MPMwoYeFJTaks1ArWyYzWncfKtYwcslsMIGFUkKvibjprr76F AYpFxa0IsTX//2FOGlhtyJE6Ou0g4AE2O9VKpaRQgQ3x3HFnV5OvRFFa2v16bW+ebhTk 1xJArgeInPBvz9H1J0Ku2n9YwTtL887BGIt6zax28zUb2EWc5JOesGh3FpfQjaPSs+Kj KgibOGibFRC+p+In6HzHIX0uqQuMB435x2fJ+hy5GHOfv4w6d5nMzkpxCWPPXa5C0MH3 lJjg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2hhQ1NMXOjDU5s6S6cOsb8fVDkMoWsg8iul3optk8dAQOyVAsa NnYgOfWZDy8qw/Lq9BL/yUq4Y11a/M7UJhfDuRg9Wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJw0sFTVB8Xv1oySSnJ3wIFK5dKx1sbQjPW/gYC0187Tuhvscoy+Eep6lwqlUtaaY4D8zn/EgedlOAgHW0OfLs= X-Received: by 2002:a24:f444:: with SMTP id u4-v6mr9980301iti.132.1528706821127; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:47:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a4f:78c9:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:46:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84075652e978661247d71f84de46efd827869948.1528697370.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> References: <84075652e978661247d71f84de46efd827869948.1528697370.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:46:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: Remove architecture heart beat code To: Michal Simek , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Michal Simek , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Philippe Ombredanne , U-Boot Mailing List , Neil Armstrong , Kate Stewart , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Matthias Brugger , Daniel Lezcano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > There is no reason to keep this gpio based code in architecture. Use > ledtrig-heartbeat.c instead which is much more flexible then this > ancient code. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Maybe the arch maintainers will complain that the corresponding new heartbeat code is not put in place in the same patch, but I think the change is so much overdue that I don't see why they can't do that themselves if they have interest in it. BTW: m68k has the same kind of luggage, in the middle of it timekeeping code: arch/m68k/kernel/time.c Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:46:59 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] microblaze: Remove architecture heart beat code In-Reply-To: <84075652e978661247d71f84de46efd827869948.1528697370.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> References: <84075652e978661247d71f84de46efd827869948.1528697370.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > There is no reason to keep this gpio based code in architecture. Use > ledtrig-heartbeat.c instead which is much more flexible then this > ancient code. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Maybe the arch maintainers will complain that the corresponding new heartbeat code is not put in place in the same patch, but I think the change is so much overdue that I don't see why they can't do that themselves if they have interest in it. BTW: m68k has the same kind of luggage, in the middle of it timekeeping code: arch/m68k/kernel/time.c Yours, Linus Walleij