From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:45:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: sunxi: add clock support In-Reply-To: <20130404170158.8665.65205@quantum> References: <1363962042-29536-1-git-send-email-emilio@elopez.com.ar> <1363962042-29536-5-git-send-email-emilio@elopez.com.ar> <51535077.1050203@free-electrons.com> <515C9D25.3050407@free-electrons.com> <20130404170158.8665.65205@quantum> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Linus Walleij (2013-04-04 04:37:23) >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Maxime Ripard >> wrote: >> > Le 03/04/2013 13:59, Linus Walleij a ?crit : >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Maxime Ripard >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Linus, >> >>> Le 27/03/2013 14:14, Linus Walleij a ?crit : >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Emilio L?pez wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> For the port controller to work, we need to enable the apb0_pio gate. >> >>>>> This commit adds the ability to enable one clock specified on the device >> >>>>> tree to the pinctrl driver. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez >> >>>> >> >>>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij >> >>>> >> >>>> I guess you'll want to merge these as one series to some platform-specific >> >>>> tree, tell me if you want it merged in the pinctrl tree. >> >>> >> >>> The easiest would probably be to merge this patch through your patch, >> >>> with Mike taking the clock driver patches and me taking the dt ones, >> >>> once we agree on the other patches. >> >> >> >> OK then, patch applied to the pinctrl tree, thanks! >> > >> > Ouch, the previous patches aren't applied yet by Mike, and we didn't >> > have some comments from him about these patches, so I can't really say >> > if the previous patches will get merge by 3.10 or not... So we will >> > maybe end up with a broken pinctrl stuff. >> >> This is usually why we keep patches together and merge whole series >> into one tree, such as ARM SoC. >> >> Well, maybe I'll drop it then ... >> > > I plan on taking in the three clk patches after getting final comments > from Gregory. So maybe you do not need to drop the pinctrl patches? No, I'm keeping it around, no problem. Thanks Mike, Linus Walleij