From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DD4C4320E for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0131A60F91 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232166AbhH0WID (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:08:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41390 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232094AbhH0WIB (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:08:01 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F05D7C06179A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id f2so13961765ljn.1 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:07:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J1gUDdbXfLZQpW8+uzYCzKrHt4z7fUbpEHpLEh39n0k=; b=cPJpkzESORon1J7DZsXS+x0HfFUxEhUBlymkGrVP1vP/KnD3XkF/wSMn4Juhiq0LaV clxLhjJca3YMk/QoW74bsWwKFKF+TIaZeX9jHb+895y62/c4QrNGBGEmRfcC/QszVUqa 03P4Vr5P8rlKs/XZR3v0ZCEoNv24qQNbaLmVOPhiM3xHmMtoF1VfppstS+wVRZywn5DF m0A6wo5aA3t22sl1sc3u+gQptxjJ+kBxU5TvdXN54zkaAhga56NMJta+4S4fqpHTMP8f QDmFIVspsSp4mwJgjgXrNcwOY5tz1twUpNzv/0msqU7HR2GW5zDmXe0TNpObGFHJU1li v2+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J1gUDdbXfLZQpW8+uzYCzKrHt4z7fUbpEHpLEh39n0k=; b=mwLrJrVjhwoy8tp6EFAFLZjoAWbc4G0Iuersn1/HigYsenIkPu7GXfoil3Gdb+HcuK MDkUpR/7qSPyzwDQO82DJ9Y15IrSQF60KdyMXb6M4K3Ok//V2I9JE61kHTjYFJq4U+rx vwjPBfeAHIuiMLHzXIZwz8P7iNePFdUsywLt0lZSt8oS+hjHC/8JVvQq5hOYlw/tqZAX i73mpa8x1w7MNMiLt4Rjs2EIqFxM6IGCeMcuuO8Rmx03gMiQlL1kPZ9gY6n2iuQUdyFj YFwCtFkz1LhFCQhnqS+VnG6Wa4qaw4VuEzpaM5CHfBZAAJR1Nu+OEbLsAwhP+9VzES8B uqkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Y94uce3NtZOCAx7C5iOs6eRSehqXwgT24M0IM+SbcX8dxcjkZ c4e+m/hl/Ptn18/SGoiOBffOSm9eJ0yd0MB6brMHng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnOT+HvC9sFmVTbh+a5YPsytU3QCe1h24AMto3pAWQUC0hVyPRy+77bydlOPd3Lns0bs1oiZXw65gdbw60jwQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d88:: with SMTP id c8mr9360420ljj.467.1630102030256; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:07:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210822193145.1312668-1-alvin@pqrs.dk> <20210822193145.1312668-2-alvin@pqrs.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 00:06:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dsa: realtek-smi: fix mdio_free bug on module unload To: Andrew Lunn Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Alvin_=C5=A0ipraga?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Alvin_=C5=A0ipraga?= , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Rob Herring , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Michael Rasmussen , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:16 AM Andrew Lunn wrote: > > No, there isn't. I neglected to mention in the rtl8365mb patch that I > > reworked the IRQ setup (compared with rtl8366rb) so that it could be > > torn down in a neat way. So you will see that the new driver does it > > properly, but I did not touch rtl8366rb because I am not using it. I am > > happy to do the same to rtl8366rb but I don't think I should make it > > part of this series. What do you think? > > Lets see if Linus has time. He can probably model the change based on > what you have done here. I have limited bandwidth as I am effectively on parental leave, so I can't do much of writing code, but I can certainly test a patch or two. Yours, Linus Walleij