From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Revamp Semtech SX150x driver Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:08:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1476885846-16469-1-git-send-email-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1476885846-16469-1-git-send-email-andrew.smirnov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrey Smirnov , Neil Armstrong Cc: "linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Chris Healy List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the second version of the patchset originally submitted here: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg146176.html I'm sorry about your efforts, and sorry for not having had time to comment earlier, but this driver will be removed and replaced by a pin control driver by Neil Armstrong: http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=147499137422454&w=2 As you can see it arrived some weeks before. Can you please review Neils patch and make sure it satisfies your usecases? The reason we have to make a pin control driver are things you can see by the quirky things for line driving or biasing etc that you have to add if it stays in GPIO: pin control is made to handle this kind of stuff in a generic way. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755180AbcJTTJA (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:09:00 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:36343 "EHLO mail-qk0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753380AbcJTTI6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:08:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1476885846-16469-1-git-send-email-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> References: <1476885846-16469-1-git-send-email-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:08:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Revamp Semtech SX150x driver To: Andrey Smirnov , Neil Armstrong Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chris Healy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the second version of the patchset originally submitted here: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg146176.html I'm sorry about your efforts, and sorry for not having had time to comment earlier, but this driver will be removed and replaced by a pin control driver by Neil Armstrong: http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=147499137422454&w=2 As you can see it arrived some weeks before. Can you please review Neils patch and make sure it satisfies your usecases? The reason we have to make a pin control driver are things you can see by the quirky things for line driving or biasing etc that you have to add if it stays in GPIO: pin control is made to handle this kind of stuff in a generic way. Yours, Linus Walleij