From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142DDC433FE for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236476AbhLSTqW (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 14:46:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232253AbhLSTqW (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 14:46:22 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB04C061574 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id be32so12646540oib.11 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:46:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IYQeE4jabs1r8ninevJCam3jflXnaB80AfMKvSe7cSw=; b=kaa6JMI8D7p74Rzn2e/E7o01mPGOPhk+FTvwdPNPn7Pr6C7C1aOSV90vxls3uDYanv SyDj/puxgAnfIXQr9C8e4Z+pvaHJfa4Op6Ex0DfFHQyX4Pu6B6vSe73Uy6VH4AndzquK mz4pWx9Z4ShCua5JQvBz3Uxu9c06lotyIcqBKxBBjeBHgeMkq/F7godPKFc2qF9sIpfI m7u7+ZGwQHKO4fTkvNCDgw3vYBzVz8TIqxUz9UwRzeMXJcTFXGHrI6772tAIS/RayRNN +EUe7JDqn1MxORul2Xirtf1pdyEnudRv1qk7NMZG30zaW8UVD2SRzmqm8+y2eQ/48pvY Eu/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IYQeE4jabs1r8ninevJCam3jflXnaB80AfMKvSe7cSw=; b=Z7veeKHk4+n8UqxJrSQTquFbm06iWRNhlPC/YeaJBxCkpuDjYb5zJ8fCBjjPPPtRih HQgh28Ucz38CmcOFIJpgbrP9eNfnilk3jNkp90un2O/Cvc1Lmdm7t6yRPowWMfnnhIX/ H0rislunf+jmwpyDpCF/9MRihiwIEObFF9ih6QFhkSMdBFcNUadI0X2z496WQHXNZOCK MR+uPmQNPp+zw05pu5ANlbY2GEq+mDdN13wBj22GKRiGib08b+J+TbfczkckwHpq/zr0 gp1LbNm4v6iKmX6d0oKYXFa0vCVNNlEPUkktMGgJ6I8Lx84MURQe1abjPPUetO28as7L RcWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LfEtB3qfovtriOjB011twHsNtWyQ6piq07h8Gct26/om8MIo6 MxzBoMhBOoZSBMmf/fRxrLDQ4Qr9g/KBD2ZCaZUswOsbpUE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkQ9ksy80MnHmFMUgZeUAQ/uMzXx9mph0+7A0zKR6ajNBzasEPyLlcrGMB0vL+Nw+AS1uu4ZvpY+qwvu5F0+k= X-Received: by 2002:aca:120f:: with SMTP id 15mr9514015ois.132.1639943181680; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:46:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211216201342.25587-1-luizluca@gmail.com> <20211218081425.18722-1-luizluca@gmail.com> <20211218081425.18722-2-luizluca@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211218081425.18722-2-luizluca@gmail.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:46:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek-smi: mark unsupported switches To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, olteanv@gmail.com, ALSI@bang-olufsen.dk, arinc.unal@arinc9.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:14 AM Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: > Some listed switches are not really supported yet. > > Reviewed-by: Ar=C4=B1n=C3=A7 =C3=9CNAL > Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca (...) > - "realtek,rtl8366" > + "realtek,rtl8366" (not supported yet) This is still Linuxisms, (not supported yet) does not belong in the DT bindings. When the NetBSD developers (who use device tree) read this what are they supposed to think? That it is not supported yet on NetBSD? Or U-Boot? Windows? Please just drop these. Yours, Linus Walleij