From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753323AbdC0Npp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:45:45 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.213.42]:36467 "EHLO mail-vk0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753085AbdC0Npo (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:45:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170327121603.o3mosne53xxnh423@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20170327121603.o3mosne53xxnh423@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:45:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: locking/atomic: Introduce atomic_try_cmpxchg() To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , Denys Vlasenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , Linus Torvalds , Paul McKenney , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've come across: >> >> commit a9ebf306f52c756c4f9e50ee9a60cd6389d71344 >> Author: Peter Zijlstra >> Date: Wed Feb 1 16:39:38 2017 +0100 >> locking/atomic: Introduce atomic_try_cmpxchg() >> >> The primitive has subtle difference with all other implementation that >> I know of, and can lead to very subtle bugs. Some time ago I've spent >> several days debugging a memory corruption caused by similar >> implementation. > > OK, so how about this? > > --- > Subject: atomic: Fix try_cmpxchg semantics > From: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Mon Mar 27 13:54:38 CEST 2017 > > Dmitry noted that the new try_cmpxchg() primitive is broken when the > old pointer doesn't point to local stack. > > He writes: "Consider a classical lock-free stack push: > > node->next = atomic_read(&head); > do { > } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&head, &node->next, node)); > > This code is broken with the current implementation, the problem is > with unconditional update of *__po. > > In case of success it writes the same value back into *__po, but in > case of cmpxchg success we might have lose ownership of some memory > locations and potentially over what __po has pointed to. The same > holds for the re-read of *__po. " > > He also points out that this makes it surprisingly different from the > similar C/C++ atomic operation. > > After investigating the code-gen differences caused by this patch; and > a number of alternatives (Linus dislikes this interface lots), we > arrived at these results (size x86_64-defconfig/vmlinux): > > GCC-6.3.0: > > 10735757 cmpxchg > 10726413 try_cmpxchg > 10730509 try_cmpxchg + patch > 10730445 try_cmpxchg-linus > > GCC-7 (20170327): > > 10709514 cmpxchg > 10704266 try_cmpxchg > 10704266 try_cmpxchg + patch > 10704394 try_cmpxchg-linus > > From this we see that the patch has the advantage of better code-gen on > GCC-7 and keeps the interface roughly consistent with the C language > variant. > > Fixes: a9ebf306f52c ("locking/atomic: Introduce atomic_try_cmpxchg()") > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 5 +++-- > include/linux/atomic.h | 16 ++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg.h > @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ extern void __add_wrong_size(void) > default: \ > __cmpxchg_wrong_size(); \ > } \ > - *_old = __old; \ > - success; \ > + if (unlikely(!success)) \ > + *_old = __old; \ > + likely(success); \ > }) > > #define __try_cmpxchg(ptr, pold, new, size) \ > --- a/include/linux/atomic.h > +++ b/include/linux/atomic.h > @@ -428,9 +428,11 @@ > #define __atomic_try_cmpxchg(type, _p, _po, _n) \ > ({ \ > typeof(_po) __po = (_po); \ > - typeof(*(_po)) __o = *__po; \ > - *__po = atomic_cmpxchg##type((_p), __o, (_n)); \ > - (*__po == __o); \ > + typeof(*(_po)) __r, __o = *__po; \ > + __r = atomic_cmpxchg##type((_p), __o, (_n)); \ > + if (unlikely(__r != __o)) \ > + *__po = __r; \ > + likely(__r == __o); \ > }) > > #define atomic_try_cmpxchg(_p, _po, _n) __atomic_try_cmpxchg(, _p, _po, _n) > @@ -1022,9 +1024,11 @@ static inline int atomic_dec_if_positive > #define __atomic64_try_cmpxchg(type, _p, _po, _n) \ > ({ \ > typeof(_po) __po = (_po); \ > - typeof(*(_po)) __o = *__po; \ > - *__po = atomic64_cmpxchg##type((_p), __o, (_n)); \ > - (*__po == __o); \ > + typeof(*(_po)) __r, __o = *__po; \ > + __r = atomic64_cmpxchg##type((_p), __o, (_n)); \ > + if (unlikely(__r != __o)) \ > + *__po = __r; \ > + likely(__r == __o); \ > }) > > #define atomic64_try_cmpxchg(_p, _po, _n) __atomic64_try_cmpxchg(, _p, _po, _n) Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov