From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1309319494-17951-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1309771536-10597-4-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <4E1411BB.4010000@compulab.co.il> <4E1B3ECC.5080308@compulab.co.il> <4E1B4E21.1090507@compulab.co.il> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:57:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] MTD: pxa3xx_nand: enable multiple chip select support From: Daniel Mack To: Lei Wen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Eric Miao , David Woodhouse , Artem Bityutskiy , Lei Wen , Haojian Zhuang , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Igor Grinberg , linux-arm-kernel List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Lei Wen wrote: > I retest with suspend&resume on my board, each time that board would > reset the timing in the > begining of pxa3xx_cmdfunc as expected. So this should be ok as it is > the same behavior > with original code. Ok, just to be sure - as there have been quite some iterations fot this now - can you send me a link to your most current version of this patch again, please? Just to avoid confusion which version we're talking about. Thanks, Daniel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:57:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] MTD: pxa3xx_nand: enable multiple chip select support In-Reply-To: References: <1309319494-17951-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1309771536-10597-4-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <4E1411BB.4010000@compulab.co.il> <4E1B3ECC.5080308@compulab.co.il> <4E1B4E21.1090507@compulab.co.il> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Lei Wen wrote: > I retest with suspend&resume on my board, each time that board would > reset the timing in the > begining of pxa3xx_cmdfunc as expected. So this should be ok as it is > the same behavior > with original code. Ok, just to be sure - as there have been quite some iterations fot this now - can you send me a link to your most current version of this patch again, please? Just to avoid confusion which version we're talking about. Thanks, Daniel