All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigbrady.com>,
	"Neil Horman" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:17:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACV3sbLJFwajVQuYfAYW9mt6tm8zeMa-ctKGyGq+qnXtWxFeCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACV3sbJjDhzKq8YQEnrTQPVVw7YsZjLe45G5sWaMRBk3+Vxkcg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2117 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/8/23 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>:
>> On 08/22, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/21/2011 11:36 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> > Concur.  The comment should be changed
>>> > Neil
>>> >
>>> > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 08/21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 08/21, bookjovi@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> For non-pipe case, limit 0 also means drop the coredump, so just put
>>> >>>> the zero limit check at do_coredump function begining.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Neil, what do you think? Should we change the code or the comment?
>>> >>
>>> >> Personally I think we should fix the comment. I think RLIMIT_CORE
>>> >> doesn't apply in this case, limit == 1 check is very special. And
>>> >> this is what linux always did, except between 725eae32 and 898b374a.
>>>
>>> Sorry for jumping in late here.
>>> I would really like `ulimit -c 0` to completely disable core dumps,
>>> including not running core_pattern, as I also mentioned here:
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/62511
>>> I noticed this in a script where ctrl-\ was taking a long
>>> time to be registered as the core_pattern was run unconditionally.
>>
>> May be. As I said, I do not really know and personally I agree with
>> everything. My only point was, this is not the bug, this is what we
>> always did.
>>
>> This is up to Neil, I think.
>>
>> Oleg.
>>
>>
> Well, so here have two questions.
> 1) That comments "but a limit of 0 skips the dump" definitely is wrong
> right now, it don't match with reality.
> 2) In ispipe case, core limit 0 should skip the dump or not? this need
> more discussion.
>    from pipe coredump point of view, core limit is irrelevant, it
> doesn't write to file system.
>    from user point of view, there will be a lot of core files if we
> let core limit 0 create core file, user might be boring.
>
> I fix the comments part by below patch(thanks Oleg's comments), please
> use attachment patch when merge.
>

Patch attached.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-coredump-fix-wrong-comments-on-core-limits-of-pipe-c.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1761 bytes --]

From dc7b02a1e0e413fb96d22f1d4ef4da98115cfb9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:34:29 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] coredump: fix wrong comments on core limits of pipe coredump case

In commit 898b374a, core limits recursive check vaule changed from 0 to 1,
but the corresponding comments was not changed correctly.

Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
---
 fs/exec.c |   15 ++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 25dcbe5..ba493cc 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -2158,15 +2158,16 @@ void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		}
 
 		if (cprm.limit == 1) {
-			/*
+			/* See umh_pipe_setup() which sets RLIMIT_CORE = 1.
+			 *
 			 * Normally core limits are irrelevant to pipes, since
 			 * we're not writing to the file system, but we use
-			 * cprm.limit of 1 here as a speacial value. Any
-			 * non-1 limit gets set to RLIM_INFINITY below, but
-			 * a limit of 0 skips the dump.  This is a consistent
-			 * way to catch recursive crashes.  We can still crash
-			 * if the core_pattern binary sets RLIM_CORE =  !1
-			 * but it runs as root, and can do lots of stupid things
+			 * cprm.limit of 1 here as a speacial value, this is a
+			 * consistent way to catch recursive crashes.
+			 * We can still crash if the core_pattern binary sets
+			 * RLIM_CORE = !1, but it runs as root, and can do
+			 * lots of stupid things.
+			 *
 			 * Note that we use task_tgid_vnr here to grab the pid
 			 * of the process group leader.  That way we get the
 			 * right pid if a thread in a multi-threaded
-- 
1.6.5.2


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-21 22:36 [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0 Neil Horman
2011-08-22 13:23 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-22 13:27   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-22 15:32 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-22 16:19   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-24 10:14     ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-24 10:17       ` Jovi Zhang [this message]
2011-08-24 11:01       ` Neil Horman
2011-08-25 10:03         ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-25 10:55           ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26  9:15             ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-25 15:57         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 18:43           ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 14:11             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-26 15:39               ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26  9:09           ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-26 14:10             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-14  5:49         ` Jovi Zhang
2012-07-07 11:35           ` Jovi Zhang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-21 11:25 bookjovi
2011-08-21 15:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-21 15:57   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACV3sbLJFwajVQuYfAYW9mt6tm8zeMa-ctKGyGq+qnXtWxFeCA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bookjovi@gmail.com \
    --cc=P@draigbrady.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.