All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix guard_bio_eod to check for real EOD errors
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:33:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOBqTxXrMhqEAvQ8nMe9aYdrevj372_67aiZhXUFxjcgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222141311.24694-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com>

Hi Carlos,

Cc block list given it is related with interface between fs and block layer.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:14 PM Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> guard_bio_eod() can truncate a segment in bio to allow it to do IO on
> odd last sectors of a device.
>
> It already checks if the IO starts past EOD, but it does not consider
> the possibility of an IO request starting within device boundaries can
> contain more than one segment past EOD.
>
> In such cases, truncated_bytes can be bigger than PAGE_SIZE, and will
> underflow bvec->bv_len.

It can cause memory corruption even for < PAGE_SIZE, also it can be correct
to see > PAGE_SIZE truncated_bytes:

- xfs is going to support big block size which may be 64k
- multi-page bvec patches have been in block tree, and it is planned to land
v5.1, so > PAGE_SIZE truncating may come because .bv_len can be much
bigger than PAGE_SIZE

- suppose fs block size is 4k, bio sector is 1022 and size is 4k, and
disk size is
1024, last bvec is (0, 1024), then 'truncated_bytes' will be 3k, so
the check can't
capture this case, and memory corruption still may be caused.

>
> Fix this by checking if truncated_bytes is lower than PAGE_SIZE.
>
> This situation has been found on filesystems such as isofs and vfat,
> which doesn't check the device size before mount, if the device is
> smaller than the filesystem itself, a readahead on such filesystem,
> which spans EOD, can trigger this situation, leading a call to
> zero_user() with a wrong size possibly corrupting memory.
>
> I didn't see any crash, or didn't let the system run long enough to
> check if memory corruption will be hit somewhere, but adding
> instrumentation to guard_bio_end() to check truncated_bytes size, was
> enough to see the error.
>
> The following script can trigger the error.
>
> MNT=/mnt
> IMG=./DISK.img
> DEV=/dev/loop0
>
> mkfs.vfat $IMG
> mount $IMG $MNT
> cp -R /etc $MNT &> /dev/null
> umount $MNT
>
> losetup -D
>
> losetup --find --show --sizelimit 16247280 $IMG
> mount $DEV $MNT
>
> find $MNT -type f -exec cat {} + >/dev/null

BTW, which kernel is  for this issue? Did you investigate why the bad bio
is made?

>
> Kudos to Eric Sandeen for coming up with the reproducer above
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> P.S. I'm not 100% proficient in bio internals, so I'm not sure if this is the
> right fix, so comments are much appreciated.
> Thanks
>
>  fs/buffer.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 784de3dbcf28..32dc5cd2f6ba 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -3063,6 +3063,13 @@ void guard_bio_eod(int op, struct bio *bio)
>         /* Uhhuh. We've got a bio that straddles the device size! */
>         truncated_bytes = bio->bi_iter.bi_size - (maxsector << 9);
>
> +       /*
> +        * The bio contains more than one segment which spans EOD, just return
> +        * and let IO layer turn it into an EIO
> +        */
> +       if (truncated_bytes > PAGE_SIZE)
> +               return;
> +

The correct check should be:

+       if (truncated_bytes > bvec->bv_len)
+               return;

Also it should be helpful to warn on this bad bio, but it is fine to not do it
here cause block layer logs this bad bio too.

BTW, this is just a workaround, not one real fix on the reported problem.

Thanks,
Ming Lei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-22 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-22 14:13 [PATCH] fs: fix guard_bio_eod to check for real EOD errors Carlos Maiolino
2019-02-22 14:47 ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-02-22 23:33 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-02-24 21:36   ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-25 13:26   ` Carlos Maiolino
2019-02-26  2:03     ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26  9:37       ` Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACVXFVOBqTxXrMhqEAvQ8nMe9aYdrevj372_67aiZhXUFxjcgQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.