From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] IB/srp: Add multichannel support Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 23:27:24 +0800 Message-ID: References: <541C27BF.6070609@acm.org> <541C28E0.7010705@acm.org> <541C49EC.6030404@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <541C49EC.6030404-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-rdma , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Robert Elliott List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 09/19/14 16:28, Ming Lei wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Bart Van Assche >> wrote: >>> >>> @@ -2643,7 +2754,8 @@ static struct scsi_host_template srp_template = { >>> .proc_name = DRV_NAME, >>> .slave_configure = srp_slave_configure, >>> .info = srp_target_info, >>> - .queuecommand = srp_queuecommand, >>> + .queuecommand = srp_sq_queuecommand, >>> + .mq_queuecommand = srp_mq_queuecommand, >> >> >> Another choice is to obtain hctx from request directly, then mq can >> reuse the .queuecommand interface too. > > > Hello Ming, > > Is the hctx information already available in the request data structure ? I > have found a mq_ctx member but no hctx member. Did I perhaps overlook > something ? You are right, but the mq_ctx can be mapped to hctx like below way: ctx = rq->mq_ctx; hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, ctx->cpu); Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html