From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23554C43387 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 21:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ABE21473 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 21:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=silvair-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@silvair-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="ijFniqfw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388560AbeLQVKJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:10:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com ([209.85.222.181]:45369 "EHLO mail-qk1-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731747AbeLQVKJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:10:09 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id y78so8221118qka.12 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:10:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=silvair-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mLOrilvPpO97iNEzV9WpdjADlPIG2V+MvGjfAIc0ztE=; b=ijFniqfwLuwN7X4DGSTOXFmWqJEv7qHLu4ATY1fJLdJ3TbVDaz9sPU9C+hkaz4KOjL rIDhoSxHAhBxfax/W8qFHrmB8yPZs7h+mjR1h4JFCDnAmAr8FVqDlxCyfJT/suBUqBOq D+PAIPIlIDnZvWueYFFs2R9CZ+6QOsqT3V+EnJOFQr1JkaMmdL8eaqCCED9/xqe+XV/q 5LAp0uY7Mg7259/o+H4zXMBn6AwXRovUPHY4QXyQDfpMDVxYcHMQQX+7UMNOt2LHoN0s 1CJJn1YQjr1/pwS+oiM7OvFUS5mWXrA5xqm7ynQWpH1KSQC6ZWdCEir4tVOSvwjZ9+cP GNqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mLOrilvPpO97iNEzV9WpdjADlPIG2V+MvGjfAIc0ztE=; b=meVE7NQWO7oad9H3ueFjchHyxBf3gnbvyKxxBbgZw/GGG6etQosiVoWfdvOaRNhF7E omI1D3EeEgMjqJdxQM3iLVGlsBJNHln0XcpsFElG9A9Iy/x78GiY8unFENPWHxAwq0qZ 5Mzy7jEnJVJ+XgNgyt9qWVpFkgMGD6MFUpWw4rDSu8zuUuCZsUrC5ydbOLnTNwAtukQI u5pFwN3APtC1FTK/zRKQUK/Kk9OTvvzosAPDZe4mPgm6q09pG/6wDjzjvaxGSN62rINT 9D0fX6B15gVS5Vp7GCjiDGLNj91nNCiJdHLMj/l4mRKuHIn0DmNvcdjyK+Eml7aQ4BGQ +Fvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZD1KPhZi7abNNWrrvXmDnVVeBvG2ayXQV4gObvW3r2+YMq2j40 i1rymDdEKB9ZImsAKq2Fg9WVXIeurDr5vAAZSu6MFE6or38= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UjOoq50ZTWxvFMuQEpesSbAerMiHe0QaXsYpj/rRlfYsgL9CZPx6tsTOiQvvxsvx+gIW2uyII5g1GXBKx5F94= X-Received: by 2002:a37:12a1:: with SMTP id 33mr13798380qks.151.1545081007224; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:10:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Lowas=2DRzechonek?= Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:09:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Plans for meshd To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi, Given recent patches to mesh, what are your mid to long-term plans to enable co-existence of bluetoothd and meshd on a single system? >From what I gather (please, correct me if I'm wrong), current implementation of mesh-io-generic assumes that meshd is the sole owner of the BLE adapter, because the HCI socket is bound using as HCI_CHANNEL_USER, so at the moment the daemons are unable to share the same HCI device. Is my understanding correct? regards --=20 Micha=C5=82 Lowas-Rzechonek Lambda Team Leader Silvair Jasnog=C3=B3rska 44 31-358 Krakow POLAND http://www.silvair.com