From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539D8C3F2D2 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E12F2072D for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="S/Z0lJck" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726702AbgCERcr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:32:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:36745 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726004AbgCERcr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:32:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id g83so6644396wme.1 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:32:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uKve1FzC0bUeOwmZph4lB5S6WHjrFbK8ta6DQAIinis=; b=S/Z0lJckipqa5hqxTOLLVLnw63asKRFvzFZCb1Wa4R5561zKoAhZUf6I8sn2VY5pQj 9MAcPxu4Iuvr3cdkLXm7C3Vj8tOBMCiS9BqDP8OQlZQelJycidGJiQ/rTOMi612IVyjT 0ekvGti7mX/YkMGSqVspVoglef9rF+3ZAMUTc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uKve1FzC0bUeOwmZph4lB5S6WHjrFbK8ta6DQAIinis=; b=NB5jlobxJ82sTGkfyrQAglnDlUhcoZhzPHOson3zTJlm1Yics5vZsUw7hQDaeO/JF/ M/FzvZEk7+btH5TEMhV7ushBy7y/LBQ6M+olWFPSsp31vtyTrhxvHTTbjqwMLQPxsWk1 ftS0gDB7dkCh1GUcLHlsAFNg5t2lX/CAiipLl/LcUxs6sNvsdUAPEmJIL9O4dy75QH4o lsK0WBRxqVtD548KizKIj8/Xuo6QJ0Z5J/ypwdRjBjVUVrUhi8aW9ITQKL1yPmKoSiJ8 m7DuyNfRHEDFt+KN9Cnk197AO+Q8GqwyBBOII1PL+NIDxMrvqHTtHc8yQjaGGmlzJ5vK eS4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2hp/9b55ukc+pIy0bxv0e6M7+tzrKMznAqbSGZzAaEiRDimY2k 0A8RNxRCvk+UhWZxipEkFbN9lGsNG9jK9VPp+zwTzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuWp699fZXvPlnYzdSTJu6gqW8QE9Dy7HEdvkWGiDovYo6X7AdXdsYYM9mLGXcgc1GTGtt4/xsmq7w6ol/Zg90= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f610:: with SMTP id w16mr10529527wmc.136.1583429564761; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:32:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200305175528.5b3ccc09@canb.auug.org.au> <715919f5-e256-fbd1-44ff-8934bda78a71@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: From: KP Singh Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 18:32:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (bpf_trace) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , bpf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This fails as we added bpf_test_run_tracing in net/bpf/test_run.c which gets built only CONFIG_NET is enabled. Which, this particular config, disables. Alexei, if it's okay with you. I can send a patch that separates the tracing test code into kernel/bpf/test_run_trace.c which depends only on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. - KP On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:22 PM KP Singh wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:13 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > On 3/4/20 10:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Changes since 20200304: > > > > > > > > > > on i386: > > > > > > ld: kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o:(.rodata+0x38): undefined reference to `bpf_prog_test_run_tracing' > > > > KP, > > Please take a look. > > Sure. Taking a look. > > - KP