From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ayM6R-0004YA-LZ for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 16:26:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-x242.google.com with SMTP id n2so5316569obo.1 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:25:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1462464776.13075.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1462125592.5535.194.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <865DA393-262D-40B6-A9D3-1B978CD5F6C6@gmail.com> <1462128385.5535.200.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462136140.5535.219.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462201620.5535.250.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462205669.5535.254.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462464776.13075.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 19:25:52 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood From: Roman Yeryomin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Jonathan Morton , "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , Dave Taht , ath10k , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net On 5 May 2016 at 19:12, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 17:53 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > >> >> qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 >> quantum 1514 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn >> Sent 12306 bytes 128 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) >> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 >> maxpacket 0 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0 >> new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 > > > Limit of 1024 packets and 1024 flows is not wise I think. > > (If all buckets are in use, each bucket has a virtual queue of 1 packet, > which is almost the same than having no queue at all) > > I suggest to have at least 8 packets per bucket, to let Codel have a > chance to trigger. > > So you could either reduce number of buckets to 128 (if memory is > tight), or increase limit to 8192. Will try, but what I've posted is default, I didn't change/configure that. Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k