From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752208AbcAPOo0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:44:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com ([209.85.213.178]:35019 "EHLO mail-ig0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751976AbcAPOoY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:44:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87bn8l7miw.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <8128014.DbbgBtKY3z@wuerfel> <8760ywd5fe.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <4037550.DMaVTE01Aq@wuerfel> <87bn8l7miw.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:44:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Kalle Valo Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , Hauke Mehrtens , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michael Buesch , Network Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. -- Rafał From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:44:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8128014.DbbgBtKY3z@wuerfel> <8760ywd5fe.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <4037550.DMaVTE01Aq@wuerfel> <87bn8l7miw.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , Hauke Mehrtens , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michael Buesch , Network Development To: Kalle Valo Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87bn8l7miw.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you = take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok = for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. --=20 Rafa=C5=82 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zajec5@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?=) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:44:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused In-Reply-To: <87bn8l7miw.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <8128014.DbbgBtKY3z@wuerfel> <8760ywd5fe.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <4037550.DMaVTE01Aq@wuerfel> <87bn8l7miw.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. -- Rafa?