From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]:37792 "EHLO mail-ig0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355AbcACPSM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:18:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net> <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com> <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net> <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com> <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:18:11 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20160103_161920_208866_CADC4179) Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker() From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Arend van Spriel Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Julia Lawall , Sergei Shtylyov , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Network Development , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures? >> >> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >> further comparisons? > > Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know about it, don't you? I'm against this patch as well. -- Rafał From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker() Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:18:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net> <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com> <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net> <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com> <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Julia Lawall , Sergei Shtylyov , libertas-dev-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Network Development , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arend van Spriel Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5688EBAC.5000701-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target ar= chitectures? >> >> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >> further comparisons? > > Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know about it, don't you? I'm against this patch as well. --=20 Rafa=C5=82 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles= s" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:18:11 +0000 Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker() Message-Id: List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net> <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com> <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net> <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com> <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Arend van Spriel Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Julia Lawall , Sergei Shtylyov , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Network Development , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target archit= ectures? >> >> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >> further comparisons? > > Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know about it, don't you? I'm against this patch as well. --=20 Rafa=C5=82 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html