All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org, mfick@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Hiding some refs in ls-remote
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:50:10 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8C4qx0P621imj5B+HdoJkow0_jaGLVDRvdCDw3YRnK98g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358555826-11883-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> This is an early preview of reducing the network cost while talking
> with a repository with tons of refs, most of which are of use by
> very narrow audiences (e.g. refs under Gerrit's refs/changes/ are
> useful only for people who are interested in the changes under
> review).  As long as these narrow audiences have a way to learn the
> names of refs or objects pointed at by the refs out-of-band, it is
> not necessary to advertise these refs.
>
> On the server end, you tell upload-pack that some refs do not have
> to be advertised with the uploadPack.hiderefs multi-valued
> configuration variable:
>
>         [uploadPack]
>                 hiderefs = refs/changes
>
> The changes necessary on the client side to allow fetching objects
> at the tip of a ref in hidden hierarchies are much more involved and
> not part of this early preview, but the end user UI is expected to
> be like these:
>
>         $ git fetch $there refs/changes/72/41672/1
>         $ git fetch $there 9598d59cdc098c5d9094d68024475e2430343182
>
> That is, you ask for a refname as usual even though it is not part
> of ls-remote response, or you ask for the commit object that is at
> the tip of whatever hidden ref you are interested in.

Should the client side learn how to list hidden refs too? I'm thinking
of an extreme case where upload-pack advertises nothing (or maybe just
refs/heads/master) and it's up to the client to ask for the ref
selection it's interested in. upload-pack may need more updates to do
that, I think.
-- 
Duy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-19  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-19  0:37 [PATCH 0/2] Hiding some refs in ls-remote Junio C Hamano
2013-01-19  0:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] upload-pack: share more code Junio C Hamano
2013-01-19  0:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] upload-pack: allow hiding ref hiearchies Junio C Hamano
2013-01-19  5:50 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2013-01-19 19:16   ` [PATCH 0/2] Hiding some refs in ls-remote Junio C Hamano
2013-01-20 18:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-21  1:46     ` Duy Nguyen
2013-01-21 22:56     ` Jeff King
2013-01-19  6:18 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-01-19 16:50 ` Jeff King
2013-01-20 18:06   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-20 22:08     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-21 23:01       ` Jeff King
2013-01-21 23:33         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-21 23:45           ` Jeff King
2013-01-21 23:03     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACsJy8C4qx0P621imj5B+HdoJkow0_jaGLVDRvdCDw3YRnK98g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mfick@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.