From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Raghavan Subject: Re: PulseAudio and SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:02:00 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com (mail-yk0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0B326681B for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ykfl8 with SMTP id l8so16752089ykf.1 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 05:32:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" Cc: Takashi Iwai , Tanu Kaskinen , Lars-Peter Clausen , clemens@ladisch.de, David Henningsson List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 12 June 2015 at 17:59, Arun Raghavan wrote: > Hi folks, > I'd like to bring this one up again, since we are currently in the > sub-optimal position of forcing ~100 ms latency on USB devices. The > original thread is here -- > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2013-December/069666.html While we sort this out, though, is there an upper bound on the USB transfer size (that we could then use a rewind safety margin)? We might be able to use this as a workaround till this can be fixed properly. -- Arun